Associate
- Joined
- 15 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 101
any reason why its coming up with Intel(R) HD Graphics Family 8.15.10.2509 3862Mb?
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
***Official Unigine Heaven 2.5 Benchmark Scores***
- Thread starter w3bbo
- Start date
- Status
Soldato
trying to work out why I thought my 560ti performance should be better. Looked at dcsarge as he had 1131, and it appears he hadn't run 4x AA ? http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=19985805&postcount=976 (Apologies if I'm wrong dcsarge! 
)
Will look at the other one's though as well.. as I desperately want to beat the 470's lol.
)Will look at the other one's though as well.. as I desperately want to beat the 470's lol.
It tends to run quiet but when put under load and the gpus hit 80 or so then the fans kick in and bring temps down. As far as usability goes I haven't felt any effects on the keyboard or touchpad while using it.
I went for the 3 yr warranty on it so I'm not worrying about temps that much.
Soldato
Sounds like you haven't disabled the on chip graphics? Do you have an plug in graphics card?
Soldato
Back on standard CPU clock to test new xfire 6950 config, I think this puts me at #22 on the ATI list
The list in the first post hasn't been updated for a month so you may be lower than that.
Associate
Finally put my 470 through Heaven. Beats the other single 470s on the list
GTX 470 @ 850/1700/1800 core/shader/memory
930 @ 4GHz
Probably be able to get higher on both the GPU and CPU, the GPU clocks are my folding stable core/shader and a little bump on the memory just to see what happened.
Next time I'll do the screenshot better heh, just looked through and realised almost everyone else has saved to HTML and screenshotted that.
GTX 470 @ 850/1700/1800 core/shader/memory
930 @ 4GHz
Probably be able to get higher on both the GPU and CPU, the GPU clocks are my folding stable core/shader and a little bump on the memory just to see what happened.
Next time I'll do the screenshot better heh, just looked through and realised almost everyone else has saved to HTML and screenshotted that.
Finally put my 470 through Heaven. Beats the other single 470s on the list
GTX 470 @ 850/1700/1800 core/shader/memory
930 @ 4GHz
Probably be able to get higher on both the GPU and CPU, the GPU clocks are my folding stable core/shader and a little bump on the memory just to see what happened.
Next time I'll do the screenshot better heh, just looked through and realised almost everyone else has saved to HTML and screenshotted that.
There you go
Last edited:
Back on standard CPU clock to test new xfire 6950 config, I think this puts me at #22 on the ATI list
think hes gona update it all this weekend..im hopeing for number 10
Associate
There you go
Heh, I was going to post it like that but I figured I would end up annoying people with lower resolutions.
I've now broken 1100
the card's still clocking higher but I'm now running out of room on Afterburner's core/shader clock slider.Heh, I was going to post it like that but I figured I would end up annoying people with lower resolutions.
I've now broken 1100
Edited.
Do you need to enable unofficial overclocking to allow a greater range?
Associate
Sounds about right, however ironically I hit my wall at the clocks I tested just before that post, it won't go any higher.
Still, I'm pretty happy with 1111, that even beats one lonely 580 down at 1085, as well as a few 480s and 570s.
Soldato
Right, thats it. clocking the 560ti higher lol. (couldn't get much higher ( 1080 points) without getting artifacts 
(maybe with excessive voltage.. but don't really want to go higher than 1.1 too much).
(maybe with excessive voltage.. but don't really want to go higher than 1.1 too much).
Last edited:
Soldato
Hmmm, this seems really low - why isnt it showing my ATI 2GB 6950? o_O
Soldato
Are you using LucidLogix?
The score looks fine for a HD 6950 though you did forget the 4xAA.
The integrated GPU would never reach that score.
Soldato
Is that the Virtu application?
Ive tried running with it on and off and has made no difference, although on the card icon it says discrete??
Ive tried running with it on and off and has made no difference, although on the card icon it says discrete??
Is your monitor connected directly to the graphics card or to the motherboard output?
Are you using the motherboard's video output at all?
There's nothing wrong with your score though it will be a bit lower if you run the benchmark with 4xAA as you should do to have a recognised score in this thread.
Nelly (6950) - 1183
bobby898 (6950) - 1148
Phase (6950) - 1109
nails666 (6950) - 1103
Mr Krugga (6950) - 1102
insejn (6950) - 1064
sldsmkd (6950) - 1049
iTek (6950) - 1047
Avathar77 (6950) - 1047
Laney88 (6950) - 1043
Dregan (6950) - 1040
mrplou (6950) - 1034
Soldato
No plugged straight into the 6950 graphics card - nothing plugged into the mobo output
If you don't use the onboard GPU then disable it in the Device Manager.
Perhaps the benchmark is just picking it up because it's enabled even though you're actually using the HD 6950.
Run the benchmark again afterwards, not forgetting the 4xAA, and you'll likely get a similar score to those I posted above.
Perhaps the benchmark is just picking it up because it's enabled even though you're actually using the HD 6950.
Run the benchmark again afterwards, not forgetting the 4xAA, and you'll likely get a similar score to those I posted above.
- Status