• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

***Official Unigine Heaven DX11 3.0 Benchmark Scores***

Kaapstad said:
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1379/00000mq.jpg

I only put the last image up to show that quad sli on gtx 690 does work. The only problem is at the benchmark settings used here the results are not good as you can see in the pic. If everything is turned up to maximum the results are a lot better.
Click to expand...

4544 points for quad XGT690 doesn't even come close to three 7970s (Pos. 3 - 5737 points) but does sneak past two 7970s (4299 points). Thanks for posting despite the poor scaling here at such a low resolution ;).
 
New CPU so new results (not that my first result was added to the list :()

2x 680s at +60 +390 with 132% power & stock voltage
CPU 3930k at 4.4ghz

G7ldN.jpg

rdjDt.gif

2Ie3s.gif
 
Last edited:
Evening folks,

Scores updated - Arron17, Alz_D, Besty, Rooster212, Nuwidol

Craterloads, setter, Wazz-1 & others - please read OP (rules)

Added a new rule to make it clear that driver tweaking is not allowed -

NO DRIVER TWEAKING - e.g. enabling performance mode or changing tesselation settings (rendering = Quality, tesselation = application controlled)

Thanks for persevering folks and apologies for being slack updating :)
 
Nuwidol said:
New CPU so new results (not that my first result was added to the list :()

2x 690s at +60 +390 with 132% power & stock voltage
CPU 3930k at 4.4ghz
Click to expand...
Looks to me like SLI is not enabled. 2x 680's bench above this, so 2x 690's should be close to double. Check you are not running in single card mode.

edit: I see that you are actually running 2x 680's so ignore me.
 
555BUK said:
Looks to me like SLI is not enabled. 2x 680's bench above this, so 2x 690's should be close to double. Check you are not running in single card mode.

edit: I see that you are actually running 2x 680's so ignore me.
Click to expand...

Oops. Meant to say 680s. Pressed 9 instead of 8 sorry...
 
Has anyone with a Multi GPU 7970 setup got any pics of runs done at the settings in the pic below. It would be interesting to see how they compare at extreme settings. 1920x1080 and 2560x1600 if possible.

00003js.jpg


Thanks
 
Your getting the performance of 3 680's / 7970's
Click to expand...

Thanks for the link.

They are a pair of 690's in sli at stock speeds. They run better at higher resolutions and extreme settings. If anyone has also got any 7970's in 3 or 4 way crossfire at 2560x1600 using extreme settings it would be interesting.
 
Kaapstad said:
Thanks for the link.

They are a pair of 690's in sli at stock speeds. They run better at higher resolutions and extreme settings. If anyone has also got any 7970's in 3 or 4 way crossfire at 2560x1600 using extreme settings it would be interesting.
Click to expand...

What cpu do you have and is it overclocked? I find when you get over 100 fps in heaven overclocking cpu gives a lot of extra fps.
 
Last edited:
Some 2560x1600 test for you. not an entry, and just to compare.

I get much higher GPU usage this res, the lower ones fluctuate slightly.

normal
heaven20120526083355347.jpg


extreme
heaven20120526085138155.jpg
 
Last edited:
Extreme with 4xAA and 4x Anisotropy CPU @4.7
00005p.jpg


Extreme with 8xAA and 16x Anisotropy CPU @4.7
00006v.jpg


Locky is it possible for you to do a run using 8xAA and 16x Anisotropy with extreme Tessellation @2560x1600

Thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom