• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

***Official Unigine Heaven DX11 3.0 Benchmark Scores***

FMTopfan said:
Impressive score Rice1985 - but best not to stick everything on one screenshot, plus it covers the cobbles too. Do you have the full sized image to add to last post (otherwise it won't be added) ?
Click to expand...

00000ah.jpg
 
shawsy109 said:
Res needs to be 1920x1080 for the bench mate
Click to expand...

He can do either as there is a seperate table for this res.... but you also need a link to GPU-Z validation.

Regardless of that - can you post your 1920 x 1080 score please...

I wanna see how it stacks up agaist my 7950's :D especially as we have the same cpu at a similair overclock.
 
Alz_D said:
He can do either as there is a seperate table for this res.... but you also need a link to GPU-Z validation.

Regardless of that - can you post your 1920 x 1080 score please...

I wanna see how it stacks up agaist my 7950's :D especially as we have the same cpu at a similair overclock.
Click to expand...

:D

Don't have the validation to back it up sorry. But here it is anyway..

44475644.jpg
 
The reason they alll mention cobbles is to prove that tesselation is active. To get on the score board it must match this:

dlknight said:
Rules
  1. Results will only be added to the table if they match the settings below!
  2. Include make / model of card to be in post
  3. Include clock settings and voltage used in post
  4. *Updated 23/03/12* - Screenshot from GPU-Z with clock settings and verification link (separate from results screen
  5. *Updated 23/03/12* - Screenshot of results in fullscreen with cobblestones from Unigine (not html report)
  6. *Added 23/03/12* - Screenshots should resized to no more than 1024 pixels wide with a link to original
  7. Results MUST be from version 3.0
Click to expand...

Thanks for the info. I am sure that score will come up as the drivers mature as well.
 
Kaapstad said:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/84/00000f.jpg/

I am having a bit of trouble inserting the above link as an image could someone let me know where I am going wrong.

Thanks
Click to expand...

If you go to "Myimages" in imgshack and click on the picture you want to use, it will throw up a box. In there you will see lots of URL codes you can cut and paste. You don't need to get geeky with it.

I personally use the "thumbnail" URL code as they banned full-size screenshots.

Paste the URL into your forum post and voila.
 
Just did a quick bench after overclocking my 3570k to 4.5ghz and I got a 13fps increase. I'll upload a screenshot once I've done stability testing it.
 
Well, with my new 7970's, my aim was to just get to 4000 score on this.

Was disappointingly easy - 1100/1725 at 1.118V

Does make me wonder just how good these would be at clocking....

Will get a screen grab at some point.
 
Like I said, was aiming for 4000, and that's what I got at those clocks.

Yeah, am happy with them, apart from being a little noisy. Can live with that though :)

Think the clocks I got at 1.118V are pretty decent, and one day I when third party coolers are cheap, and hopefully have Ivy-E (so don't have to worry about temps so much any more) will replace coolers and clock em til within an inch of their lives, until they die :D
 
*EDIT*

2x Zotac Geforce GTX560Ti "448" Editions SLI

dHepv.jpg
Original: http://i.imgur.com/V6tF3.jpg

DzNY1.gif
0fuoa.png

CPU: i7 2600k @4.7GHz
GPU core clock: 810MHz
GPU mem clock: 2100MHz
Stock voltages
Rest of rig in sig


Can't get any higher without Heaven crashing, though I haven't played with the voltages, not sure if I want to.
 
Last edited:
Wrong resolution for the benchmark mate, drop the resolution down to 1080 or 1050.
Click to expand...

00000mq.jpg


I only put the last image up to show that quad sli on gtx 690 does work. The only problem is at the benchmark settings used here the results are not good as you can see in the pic. If everything is turned up to maximum the results are a lot better.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom