• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

***Official Unigine Heaven DX11 3.0 Benchmark Scores***

UPDATED
Can i get added to OP please :) if this is ok.

Haha! :p It's actually a GTX 580, i just happen to have a 520 in my system as well for extra screens, for some reason the benchmark picks up the wrong card..

Here's my second run

00001x.jpg


overclockedsettingsforh.png


http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/6nmqu/
gpuzg.png
 
skip images

If you want your score to count then you should follow the thread rules.

Rules
  1. Results will only be added to the table if they match the settings below!
  2. Include make / model of card to be in post
  3. Include clock settings and voltage used in post
  4. *Updated 23/03/12* - Screenshot from GPU-Z with clock settings and verification link (separate from results screen
  5. *Updated 23/03/12* - Screenshot of results in fullscreen with cobblestones from Unigine (not html report)
  6. *Added 23/03/12* - Screenshots should resized to no more than 1024 pixels wide with a link to original
  7. Results MUST be from version 3.0
  8. NO DRIVER TWEAKING - e.g. enabling performance mode or changing tesselation settings (rendering = Quality, tesselation = application controlled)
 
Is Unigine bench biased towards one manufacturer? Like 3d Mark is biased towards Nvidia.

Dont know if its biased towards either but the AMD cards seem to be dominating the leaderboard on this forum. Mind you I think they are all watercooled cards at the top of the leaderboard, and watercooling doesnt help the 680's much if at all.
 
Heaven has about a 5% bias towards nvidia, but most gaming benchmarks will have more than 5% bias to nvidia so it doesn't make much difference.
 
Is Unigine bench biased towards one manufacturer? Like 3d Mark is biased towards Nvidia.

No I think it is more to do with how Ati and Nvidia work at different resolutions.

Ati 7xxx cards seem to have very high max frames at the settings used here. Where as Nvidia 6xx cards even in quad sli will produce much lower max frames.

If all settings are turned up to max and the screen resolution changed to 2560x1600 Nvidia become more competative.
 
I think the 7970 just has more potential when overclocked to the max.
Kepler already gets most of it's performance when "stock" because of the boost feature.

Get a 7970 over 1200 and it's a clear winner on the vast majority of games at 1080p i'm sure.
 
Back
Top Bottom