Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Dec 2004
- Posts
- 11,365
- Location
- Knowle, Solihull, UK
It also came with the na 1.8 K-Series engine with about 115bhp 
Oh my god... the ultimate MG ZT!
- Thread starter agw_01
- Start date
ajgoodfellow said:It also came with the na 1.8 K-Series engine with about 115bhp
120ps for the 1.8 K-series.
The 4.6 V8 produces 256bhp and 410Nm torque as standard. 0-60 in 6.2 which would be funny seeing peoples reactions.
I think this is the proper ultimate MG ZT.
http://www.wyleshardy.com/searchvie...29&serach=1&searchtext=car&pos=119&totrec=143
Last edited:
saitrix said:120ps for the 1.8 K-series.
The 4.6 V8 produces 256bhp and 410Nm torque as standard. 0-60 in 6.2 which would be funny seeing peoples reactions.
I think this is the proper ultimate MG ZT.
http://www.wyleshardy.com/searchvie...29&serach=1&searchtext=car&pos=119&totrec=143
I dont understand why you what appears to be correcting the above poster, saying its 120ps, when he said it was 115bhp.
120PS is 115bhp
The MG ZT 260 is a lovely car tho
Goatyman said:I dont understand why you what appears to be correcting the above poster, saying its 120ps, when he said it was 115bhp.
120PS is 115bhp
The MG ZT 260 is a lovely car tho
120PS is 118.35839bhp.
115bhp is 116.59503PS.
Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Dec 2004
- Posts
- 11,365
- Location
- Knowle, Solihull, UK
Nope
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 8,496
- Location
- Essex
My dad had an MG ZT for a while, I thought it was a really nice car although the ride was really bumpy
![[huzeeee]](/styles/overclockers/avatars/3.png){kind=avatar}
Lol lads dont mean to widdle on ** bonfires but theyre poo. Went out in one the other day and it crap, souded nice and the mustang v8 label they put on the engine is all well and good, but it was slow, boring, the gearshift was crap, just boring and generally not the car they are cracked up to be, dad said he wouldnt have one if it was the last car on earth.
Last edited:
saitrix said:120ps for the 1.8 K-series.
The 4.6 V8 produces 256bhp and 410Nm torque as standard. 0-60 in 6.2 which would be funny seeing peoples reactions.
I think this is the proper ultimate MG ZT.
http://www.wyleshardy.com/searchvie...29&serach=1&searchtext=car&pos=119&totrec=143
Granny, get ere... your up for sale
[huzeeee] said:
so you didnt drive it?......
i wouldnt go as far as saying it was a slow car mind.. maybe not super fast.. but im willing to bet it holds its own..
and wouldnt have it if it was the last car on earth? he must have only ever driven really nice cars in his life time then... no lil crap boxes like mine or anything..
thanking you for your optinion
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Dec 2004
- Posts
- 11,365
- Location
- Knowle, Solihull, UK
How can 6.2 seconds to 60 be described as slow?
Oracle said:
Uh....couple of things:
1) I wasn't being that serious. Should I have added an "OMGZZZ SARCASM" and a truckload of smilies onto the post to show that?
2) Having been to Longbridge, and seeing just how bad things were there (cars left in a car park with deep scratches that were just painted over without re-applying primer layers, wheels and panels left here and there, workers standing around on their mobiles not doing their job all day being some examples), I can see why they gained a reputation for quality control problems. My father did some risk-assessment work there - before he went, he'd considered a Rover 75. After the job, he wouldn't touch a Rover with a 40ft pole.
Someone I know quite well bought a brand new WRX and traded it in after 6 months for a brand new ZT 260 after taking a test drive in it. His opinion is that it is more of the drivers car than the Impreza ever could be. It certainly appears to handle exceptionaly well, and the sound of the V8 through the Xpower exhausts certainly shames the Impreza's "I'm an inline 4 running on 3 cylinders" exhaust note.
Blasphemy ![[TW]Fox](/data/man-of-honor/2009.png){kind=avatar}