Those of you who have OLED monitors, do you have a second non-OLED monitor for desktop and other non-gaming use?
No all my screens are OLED. All other screen tech feels like backwards technology now
Last edited:
Those of you who have OLED monitors, do you have a second non-OLED monitor for desktop and other non-gaming use?
the contrast is not as good as my wrgb oled but then they have near on unlimited contrast but then it blows my old ips panel out the water.Tempted to try the monitor myself. Was looking at the neo g7 but the curve seems silly, plus I don't like Samsung's support.
How's the contrast on the Aoc in HDR?
LG seem to have good refresh management, although it doesn't appear consistent across the range - heard on the 27-32" monitors some of the tech isn't on by default.I have an LG 48GQ900-B OLED Gaming monitor as my main display and a 27" 4K IPS Acer Predator as my second display.
I'm an IT consultant working remotely and play a range of games in the evenings so the LG is on 12+ Hours a day usually, 8-9 of those for productivity.
Had the LG since Feb this year and got 2395 hours on it, no burn in or dead pixels or any issues.
It has some protections such as dimming if you dont move windows for a while and will do a pixel refresh when you turn it off if its been on for 4 hours or more.
It has a matt screen which helps, i dont get any glare from it in my bright room like i do my LG C8 in the living room.
I know its not the perfect monitor, but for large format 120hz and a mix of productivity and casual gaming it hits the sweet spot for me.
and am using the LG Dual UP in the below configuration:-
Yes, I was referring to Gaming only. I don't really use my screen for anything else other than gaming. Sorry, should have mentioned that earlier.For gaming maybe but I still think OLED is flawed for desktop use and I think that's what the OP is driving at.
For those who may game but also use their screens heavily for desktop/productivity applications, the issues of text clarity/fringing and burn-in are genuine ones and, for many, will outweigh OLEDs advantages.
Personally I wouldn't consider an OLED as a desktop monitor as, whilst it would obviously be far superior for gaming, I'm also using it at the desktop for over eight hours every day and don't want to put up with inferior text clarity and burn-in issues.
The way manufacturers are all jumping on the OLED bandwagon these days is borderline annoying for those of us who choose to stick with LCD.
Take Alienware for example who, unless I'm mistaken, appear to have discontinued their LCD ultrawide monitors and now only sell the 34" OLED. What happened to the AW3821DW?
No. I wouldn't give a non-OLED monitor houseroom.Those of you who have OLED monitors, do you have a second non-OLED monitor for desktop and other non-gaming use?
the contrast is not as good as my wrgb oled but then they have near on unlimited contrast but then it blows my old ips panel out the water.
i prefer the hdr in cyberpunk with all the bells and whistles on my monitor to be honest with the ultrawide format.
If it had a 5+ year burn in warranty I'd be more comfortable, but I keep my screens much longer than 3 years.Nah i use the alienware DWF exclusively- i don’t like the extra desk clutter so got rid of my previous LCD screens.
I use it for work and gaming but i use dark mode for a lot of stuff, keep the oled refresh gizmos on and take comfort in the three year dell burn in warranty.
Fair enough but with the amount of use the screen gets it’s likely any issue will present themselves within 3 years. Also im not aware of any manufacturer that gives 3 years let alone 5 or more for image retention.If it had a 5+ year burn in warranty I'd be more comfortable, but I keep my screens much longer than 3 years.
i mostly keep the monitor in hdr mode and the mode i use for that is display hdr rather than picture movie or game hdr. if i am in sdr the bightness is set to 10 gamma 2 local dimming on. hope that helps enjoy what game you playing first ?Just ordered the AOC for £556! Any tips on settings?