obesity is often just an age issue - it's kind of like saying 'don't get old if you don't wanna get fat' - iow: not workable
Most obese people don't make it to old age. The heart won't take the strain for that long.
obesity is often just an age issue - it's kind of like saying 'don't get old if you don't wanna get fat' - iow: not workable
Am sure smokers pay a hell lot more then £20 per month due to how much duty there is on cigarettesIf it were up to me NHS contributions would be based on an individual's lifestyle.
Walk less than an average number of steps a day that's an extra £10 a month, smoke that's another £20 a month.
It worked for me years ago me and a friend wanted to join a gym which was for illustration purposes £50 a month.
He found a life insurance company that have free membership to the same gym as long as you visited at least 3 times a week average. That was about £20 a month for the insurance, if you didn't visit the gym the insurance doubled.
Basically I think the more unhealthy a lifestyle you live the more you should contribute to NHS funding.
Also it should definitely not be considered okay to be fat, the same as we don't think it's okay to have diabetes or to smoke.
a pack of 20 cigarettes with an RRp of £8 will be over 80% tax, while on some of the lowest price cigarettes tax can account for 90%4.
I'd be against that because IMO they'd classify the wrong food as unhealthy.I say tax unhealthy food and subsidise healthy food.
Out of curiosity any examples?I'd be against that because IMO they'd classify the wrong food as unhealthy.
I wish they'd hurry up. As per my thread in the bike forum (someone please tell me what tyres to buy!?) I have a decent bike half ready to go. Needs a clean, new inner tubes and tyres and I'd be off. If they leave it too long we'll miss the nice weather and most people won't bother.
Edit: The only problem is London drivers. My girlfriend has flat out refused to cycle around here and I don't blame her.
We have to look at the research and see if there's an effect. I'm sceptical until that point, but if it's proven then i'd be tepidly supportive. That said, I really think we need a lot more education on how to eat well and care for our bodies, there's so much very basic knowledge i've picked up after a health scare a few years ago that may have been of use earlier in life. As people live longer, the strains on the NHS are only going to increase.I think these taxes and smaller sizes are a con in all honesty.
Making items smaller, people will just eat more and buy more.
Quality Street is an absolute rip off, Kettle crisps were, what 250g packets and now 200g but the same price?
Take the Toblerone for example, is it still missing chunks? Rich Tea biscuits are tiny now, argh.
Perhaps Boris can tell me to find a decent bike. I spent a while researching and narrowing down my list of mountain bikes, I've been trying to buy one now for the past 5 or 6 months but nowhere has any stock, well not unless you're talking about spending £3k or so - which I am not.
Permanently "borrow" a Boris bike
London is a bit too far away, and besides they look like they'd be awful on the trails and around the Moorlands and Peak District.![]()
Taxing "unhealthy" good isn't the answer. That's putting a band aid on an open wound.
The solution needs to come before that, educating people about diet etc. And getting people to put the effort in to make a healthy meal for themselves (that doesn't cost the earth).
And I don't see why I should pay more for a chocolate bar because ~60% of the population are fat