Poll: Oppression Via circumcision

Are you for or against male circumcision?

  • For

    Votes: 44 14.1%
  • Against

    Votes: 159 51.1%
  • Pancake.

    Votes: 108 34.7%

  • Total voters
    311
I beg to differ. As someone who NEEDED to have it done on medical grounds, I'd be in immense pain and suffering without the op.

It has no downsides either.



Ditto, my foreskin wasnt as stretchy as it should be so unless you like the thought of your foreskin splitting apart upon getting a semi then the op is nothing special.

No downsides here either all working as it should although the amount of folk online who think circumcision removes your bell-end is deeply disturbing.


female circumcision on the other hand is perhaps the most vile form of barbarism.
 
this is one study and it doesnt explain or prove how circumcision reduces the risk of aids by 50%. this could be coincidence etc..., it's an interesting finding/mathematical statistic but doesn't prove or explain anything, which any scientific study needs to do.

America is suffering just as bad as any other nation despite it's relatively high percentage.
 
I think circumcision is wrong as a child and should always be a voluntary thing.

Im not circumsized, but when i was 14 i had a operation called Frenuloplasty ( look on wiki if you dont know) before i had the op i was very conscious because at 14, it was a big deal, soon as my op was over it made me feel so much better.
 
Going by the name, I'm going to guess it's rebuilding of the Frenulum or something.

*reads wiki*

I was right. Didn't really want to read that though. :p

Oh and word to the wise, don't click the links. :o

They took away my frenulum :)

It restricted the movement of foreskin, wouldnt let me retract it :)

So i had it removed. Best thing i ever did
 
There are none, it is a barbaric ritual done with the purpose of removing any enjoyment women might get from sex, and as a means of controlling when and with who they have sex. Go and look at this website

http://www.forwarduk.org.uk/

Disgusting. Take a look at this:

http://www.slate.com/id/2125225

I find it almost too difficult to read. He has an extremely moving passage on it in one of his books, also. It's just a horrific, revolting practice when done in this context.
 
Ouch I always thought snapping your banjo string would be the worst imaginable.

It didn't hurt too much when I did it (was kicked down there). It stung yes, but not an awe-inspiring level of pain but then it didn't completely snap, just tore quite a lot. It was however, like peeing through the eye of a hot needle for weeks afterwards as it healed. That was probably the real uncomfortable consequence of the whole thing. Oh, that and having a doctor play with your bloodied, shrivelled penis. Always up for the lulz me.
 
Back
Top Bottom