Its not stupid too anyone with basic reading comprehension skills.
Do you realise I just spent 3 pages saying my opinion is the alien part of the story is poor and doesn’t convince me about aliens and that I think the pilot is wrong as he is an unreliable witness for the reasons I stated.
Not only that, but every single time I explained why I think the pilot is wrong making him an unreliable witness you challenged me and disagreed with me. Perhaps you could stop flip flopping and make up your mind. Either I am right and the pilot is wrong or the pilot is right and I am wrong. You cannot have it both ways that we are both wrong.
As for cherry picking that’s just a stupid thing to say. I am not cherry picking the bits I liked. I am fact checking. After looking at the evidence and fact checking, I am saying the first part checks out and is real. The 2nd part doesn’t check out and has flaws that I pointed out and a simple alternative explanation which I pointed out. That is not cherry picking that is critical thinking.
Since the start I have been saying it’s not an alien meaning its not a solid account and not a solid witness. You’re the one that has been arguing against that and challenging me every time I said the pilot is not reliable.
Yes, the account doesn’t add up, I have been saying that since the start hence why I disagree with the 2nd part. The first part adds up, the 2nd part doesn't add up. Somehow that is a giant mystery to you.
You cannot have it both ways. You cannot complain I am dismissing the alien part as not real and say its not an alien while also saying I am wrong in calling it not reliable and not a solid story.
In short unless more evidence comes out I think the pilot is wrong in what he thinks he picked up.
