Petrol tanker drivers to go on strike

Senior Unite member on Five live this evening couldn't explain, despite repeated questions, exactly what they wanted as outcomes from the strikes.

Muscle flexing and setting of unrealistic expectations. Unions generally do a lot of good, but equally they can be incredibly irresponsible. Let's see which way this one goes, because it is pointing the direction of the latter at the moment.
 
So what T&Cs are they trying to change and what safety aspect is that going to reduce?

They won't say, says it all.

So far we've just seen appeals to emotion of 'wouldn't it be awful if people died, well yes of course. But when was the last time a tanker exploded?

I don't see any laws being undone, just accusations that the oil company's want to cut costs even in times of record profits, left wing militant statements that are best left to the 70's.
 
Given the number of HGV drivers out of work at present, many with ADR licences, I doubt the army would be needed - that just sounds like Daily Fail speak imo, I know of experienced lads made redundant from my own employers who can't find work, months after their redundancys.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/en...or-strike-which-could-bring-Easter-chaos.html

http://www.itn.co.uk/home/41936/Tanker+strike+threat+to+move+step+closer

http://www.channel4.com/news/uk-tanker-drivers-to-strike-as-army-prepares-to-step-in

Nope. Everybody is reporting it. Thats what the government have said.
 
seems like pointless muscle flexing by the union,

unless they actually come out and tell us all whats wrong with the safety standards i couldnt give a flying one about their t&cs their on circa £45k a year at a time when there are plenty drivers out there looking for work and the countries economy is in the toilet I'm assuming that tanker drivers will be limited with the same regulations that govern regular class 1 drivers ala driving hours etc. so unless someone comes out and points out some fatal flaw in the tankers their driving or something that would justify them going on strike i'm calling shenanigans and putting it down to them really being greedy and wanting more money but not having the bottle to say that as the public would crucify them if they striked on those grounds.



just a thought, how long would it take to train an experienced class 1 holder in the ADR stuff? although i'd imagine theres already a few guys out there with the right training who would jump at the chance of a job right now
 
Last edited:
If I owned a petrol station, I would be cranking the price up to £2.50 a litre.

See who really needs fuel and who doesn't.

Win win situation then.
 
The ASDA I work at was dry by the end of Sunday, even though It was visited during the day by a tanker TWICE!

Hopefully, oil burners will fill up their cars, meaning no fuel left for the vans :)
 
If I owned a petrol station, I would be cranking the price up to £2.50 a litre.

See who really needs fuel and who doesn't.

Win win situation then.

During the 2000 era protests a station round here did that, they went out of business because after the protests nobody except strangers passing through ever used them.
 
If it causes havoc I'll just use the train again. Adds an hour to my commute but could be worse.

Im getting fed up with unite they seem to be behind every strike at the moment.
 
They won't be "blockading" refineries though. If the union membership do return a "Yes" in a ballot for strike action, there will be legitimate picket lines in place which is completely different from a blockade.

I know this. What I said was in regards to actually protesting against the fuel increases. Whether you agree/accept or not. I just wondered if the threat of being charged with an act of terrorism was really a big deal considering you are protesting over fuel cost rather than a "real" act of terrorism.
 
It's being scheduled for the easter weekend is it not? Think that's what the press are reporting.

Pain in the bum, I'm racing that weekend and bet you I wont be allowed to fill up the Jerry Cans. Might try tonight and see if they'll let me do it.
 
I know this. What I said was in regards to actually protesting against the fuel increases. Whether you agree/accept or not. I just wondered if the threat of being charged with an act of terrorism was really a big deal considering you are protesting over fuel cost rather than a "real" act of terrorism.

Point taken. Completely separate issue though.
 
Back
Top Bottom