forgotten about Boris's Keeler - jennifer Arcuri, tax payer money in return for ? -Imagine if Boris Johnson
his yesterdays interview : don't know why the guy doesn't stay in the USA they like him (maybe H&M have a room to rent)
forgotten about Boris's Keeler - jennifer Arcuri, tax payer money in return for ? -Imagine if Boris Johnson
There's a picture of them when he was a kid in school lol
Grooming is when a person builds a relationship with a child, young person or an adult who's at risk so they can abuse them and manipulate them into doing things.
The abuse is usually sexual or financial, but it can also include other illegal acts.
Can you point to the posters who have defended grooming in this thread? Also who has called him "brave"?
Funny you had zero problems with Trump "inspecting" 15 year olds backstage at his teen beauty pageants. They were no doubt asking for it.
The Met definition is almost exactly what he appears to have done.and that proves he's groomed him?
Here is what the MET class as grooming
I notice you ignore all this. Typical.
Crazy thought but why don't we wait until some facts come out.
Why are you lot all parroting this same crap? It's tabloid news! It's interest is nothing but the speculation.Crazy thought but why don't we wait until some facts come out.
Systematic protection of a potential pedo because of a protected characteristic. It's peak boomer right wing CT so I'm surprised you are slow to catch up.Why is this crap even news? like headline news apparently.
is everyone massive good morning Britain fans or whatever programme he was a presenter of?
The Met definition is almost exactly what he appears to have done.
The lengths you will go too in the defence of nonces is very strange.
Why are you investing so much time in defending someone with such poor character?please show me where I have defended nonces? I'll wait.
please show me where I have defended nonces? I'll wait.
Why are you investing so much time in defending someone with such poor character?
If that is the case it has nothing do with his sexuality and everything to do with his position of influence.Systematic protection of a potential pedo because of a protected characteristic. It's peak boomer right wing CT so I'm surprised you are slow to catch up.
Edit: not surprised actually
If it is indeed true that the hierarchy of ITV turned a deliberate blind eye to Schofield's predilection for young men and maybe boys
Being a bit pedantic aren't we chief? I am heterosexual, i don't say i like woman/female, i say i like women/females.Oh are there 'boys' plural now? Or is this speculation?
Lol dude, he has been smashing a boy whilst married to a woman. He deserves all the negative press he is getting in its fullest. It's a tabloid news topic; he isn't anyone of any importance.Has anyone defended him? Not chasing with a pitchfork is not the same as defending.
I don't think anyone has villified him for being gay. They've given him 'grief' for being gay the entire time he was married. There is cheating because you've had enough, and then there is never being biologically attracted to your supposed life partner. The gay bit is irrelevant; it's just what it 'means' in the context he was in.If that is the case it has nothing do with his sexuality and everything to do with his position of influence.
If he was cheating with an 18 year old girl, he'd have been sacked most likely and he certainly wouldn't have been hailed as a hero. Him coming out as gay was to protect his career (and his hand was forced). All very clever, and something a lot of my gay friends take a dislike to.Lol dude, he has been smashing a boy whilst married to a woman. He deserves all the negative press he is getting in its fullest. It's a tabloid news topic; he isn't anyone of any importance.
I don't think anyone has villified him for being gay. They've given him 'grief' for being gay the entire time he was married. There is cheating because you've had enough, and then there is never being biologically attracted to your supposed life partner. The gay bit is irrelevant; it's just what it 'means' in the context he was in.
Lol dude, he has been smashing a boy whilst married to a woman. He deserves all the negative press he is getting in its fullest. It's a tabloid news topic; he isn't anyone of any importance.
I don't think anyone has villified him for being gay. They've given him 'grief' for being gay the entire time he was married. There is cheating because you've had enough, and then there is never being biologically attracted to your supposed life partner. The gay bit is irrelevant; it's just what it 'means' in the context he was in.
He was smashing a kid whom he knew as a child. ITV leadership protected him. His being gay is irrelevant to the main storyline; that is sufficient enough.I dont care about his negative press but if you believe that a lot of this directed towards him is not just about him being gay then I cant help you. Its very simular to the meghan and racism debarcle.
The cheating on his wife thing? God save the king and all that.
He was smashing a kid whom he knew as a child. ITV leadership protected him. His being gay is irrelevant to the main storyline; that is sufficient enough.