You want pictures of a man inside of a boy? Weird flex GaryHow do you know he was smashing a kid?
Can you point me to the evidence?
You want pictures of a man inside of a boy? Weird flex GaryHow do you know he was smashing a kid?
Can you point me to the evidence?
Why are you investing so much time in defending someone with such poor character?
Ahh you're mad he is white, got ithe's the same as the men who groomed and abused young girls in cities like Bradford. I've not seen any evidence of that yet.
A 50 odd year old having 'legal' relationship, with someone he knew when the boy was 12 or whatever. Do you think he waited until his birthday for it to become legal before slipping one in?How do you know he was smashing a kid?
Can you point me to the evidence?
Because Schofield is paying silly money per month for a crisis management company & an injunction to stop him from legally saying anything.The young guy hasn't said anything
Ahh you're mad he is white, got it
Asians grooming white girls - you are saying is bad.How the **** have you arrived at that from what I wrote?
Because Schofield is paying silly money per month for a crisis management company & an injunction to stop him from legally saying anything.
Asians grooming white girls - you are saying is bad.
White man grooming white boy - you seem to want to wait a bit for more data?
The crisis management company effectively manages the 'crisis' for Schofield. They will speak to all social media companies to turn off comments on his posts/deactivate accounts (look at his Insta, it's all removed), they'll trawl the internet and bring litigations against any site posting what they see as slander etc, they'll bring in lawyers to stop the kid (adult/whatever) from talking (and will pay him off). There is a shed load of information about Schofield's relationship with this guy on Twitter, and there are websites with information on it all which have surfaced with fairly convincing evidence/theories (I say theories lightly as I'm not a tin foil hat kinda person). I'm no jury, but to me you don't do something like that if all you've done wrong is realise you like men and cheated on your wife. The timing is curious to me, it seems this has been known about by ITV big wigs, and now a month away from when the injunction is lifted it all starts to spill out. We've seen this **** before.How exactly does this work? If there is an injunction then no one can report it so why is it costing £70k a month? What is this crisis management company doing exactly that the injunction isn't?
The crisis management company effectively manages the 'crisis' for Schofield. They will speak to all social media companies to turn off comments on his posts/deactivate accounts (look at his Insta, it's all removed), they'll trawl the internet and bring litigations against any site posting what they see as slander etc, they'll bring in lawyers to stop the kid (adult/whatever) from talking (and will pay him off). There is a shed load of information about Schofield's relationship with this guy on Twitter, and there are websites with information on it all which have surfaced with fairly convincing evidence/theories (I say theories lightly as I'm not a tin foil hat kinda person). I'm no jury, but to me you don't do something like that if all you've done wrong is realise you like men and cheated on your wife. The timing is curious to me, it seems this has been known about by ITV big wigs, and now a month away from when the injunction is lifted it all starts to spill out. We've seen this **** before.
I will be absolutely amazed if more doesn't come out and the Police don't get involved. Happy to eat my words. This is just the beginning IMO.
They've done a sterling job for 3 years!Hmm sounds like the crisis management team aren't doing **** if everything is all over social media.
You want pictures of a man inside of a boy? Weird flex Gary
A 50 odd year old having 'legal' relationship, with someone he knew when the boy was 12 or whatever. Do you think he waited until his birthday for it to become legal before slipping one in?
Friends of Willoughby say learning of affair has been 'traumatic'
Sources close to the presenter said the affair had been a 'traumatic' revelation for the This Morning host and a 'time of real sadness' as Schofield 'was her very close friend'.www.dailymail.co.uk
So unless someone makes something up about him they're defending him?Why are you investing so much time in defending someone with such poor character?
Or they paid him the most money with no likely future income he will need all he can get.I think the fact he's done all his statements through the DM leads to them having something else on him too. There no way he would go to them specifically to get his side out. Not a chance.