30k a month WTF!
Many reports of it, however it is alleged and he is paying a crisis management team to black out media from reporting or the boy(now man) from speaking
30k a month WTF!
Many reports of it, however it is alleged and he is paying a crisis management team to black out media from reporting or the boy(now man) from speaking
It’s probably best to hold off forming an opinion until the dust truly settles.
What?Genuine question - why is there an assumption he groomed the person?
It’s worth keeping in mind that this can work both ways. The term ‘sugar daddy’ was literally invented for this situation.
Which is also fine and doesn’t mean people should be jumping to conclusions now. Unlike the royal family, Schofield doesn’t have the sort of weight to keep this under wraps for ever so it will all come out eventually. What’s the rush?I agree with this but it may not settle for a while.
Genuine question - why is there an assumption he groomed the person?
I’ve not seen any evidence of that or a direct allegation from anyone actually involved or a suggestion of a police investigation/involvement.
What do think these people did before it was 'acceptable'?The creepy thing about it imo (and maybe creepy isn't the right word) is the fact it wasn't just an affair; it was that he had an affair and came out as gay. I.e. biologically uninterested in this poor lass you've strung along for decades. Not the fact in itself of gayness...
Good job stripping out all context to make a point.What?
Watch out KH you may have just ruined your 'career'. Oh, hang on....Make of it what you will (and with a tonne of salt with KH)..
It's more complicated then just an older celebrity having an affair with a younger person. The implication is Schofield knew this person as a kid (11 years old) and met him while he was at drama school. Schofield then used his fame and status to groom the kid into becoming his dirty little secret.Sorry am I missing something...but why does it matter what hes doing/done in his personal life.
It appears he has done nothing illegal, so I dont get it.
The point you're making can be made to any news story in the world (wait until we know everything); surely you can get your head around why folk are speculating? Notable people close to it condemning, super injunctions, coming out as gay, the other party in close work proximity.......Good job stripping out all context to make a point.
There is not yet any evidence they had an inappropriate relationship when the person was below the age of consent.
The two ‘knowing each other’ could range between they interacted with each other once and the person later reached out to Schofield to try and get into TV. Right the way through to they well what you guys are jumping to conclusions about.
Follow the evidence, not those who have an agenda or want the clicks… the former sometimes takes a bit of patience.
He knew the lad from age 11 and was the reason he got employed by ITV. Keep up.As far as I can see he had a relationship with a younger college. It wasn't illegal as this person wasn't a minor.
What's the issue then? Are we all writing him off as a nonce or pervert now?
True but wasn't it until much later on that he started an affair?He knew the lad from age 11 and was the reason he got employed by ITV. Keep up.
The point you're making can be made to any news story in the world (wait until we know everything); surely you can get your head around why folk are speculating? Notable people close to it condemning, super injunctions, coming out as gay, the other party in close work proximity.......