I am simply reacting to most of the comments that seem to be jumping the gun and labeling before sufficient evidence. I don't have an issue with the stereotype. I don't know the guy, I don't know the apparent "victim" and I have nothing to do with it past making comments on a forum. The same as you actually.Ahh, I think I see your main issue with the term, its currently seen as a hot button topic by those on the right, especially relating to gay men, and Phil would appear to be playing right into that stereotype.
I'm not sure how many nigh on 50 year old men take an interest in someone 30-40 years younger, help guide their career and then end up sleeping with them..
I would assume the only evidence you'd accept would the person coming out and saying 'he groomed me'?
Yes it is a very unusual development but not impossible.
I guess we will have to see what happens. I'll repeat that I'm not supporting either outcome here, I just find it unsettling that so many people on this forum are so quick to call him out as a grooming child molester just so they can be the first it say tha they said so first.