No problem. It has been too long since I've used the BDM4065UC and I didn't really make any thorough observations on that aspect, so not sure how it compares. As I say in the review, some users wouldn't notice the issue even from relatively close to the screen. And it is something you can get used to I feel.
I have no idea. It shouldn't do. I haven't had anybody else report such things and Google has not flagged it as having any security issues whatsoever (and I can assure you - it does not have Spyware and hasn't been hacked). See also https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/pcmonitors.info and other similar scanners.
Can you access YouTube? Do other sites give you this issue? Could be that your work doesn't like embedded YouTube videos or something.
They mark a lot of sites I think to stop us going on communities. Youtube works fine funnily enough.
Would you say the new Philips would be an improvement in fluidity and punchy bright colours over my Sony 55XD8599? I did wonder if I'd be ok going 12 inches smaller but if the panel doesn't have the grey bleed in the corners like this Sony and goes above 400 nits because the Sony sure doesn't then it should be better for HDR. I get the BGR overshooting on text with the tv too and I'd say my response times are alright but I want faster.
The upgrade from IPS to VA in terms of contrast will be significant, as will the superior HDR performance. It is compared favourably to much more capable IPS-type HDR solutions (with 384-dimming zones) in the review. You can also enjoy far lower input lag, although depending on sensitivity to it that may not be such a big bonus really. And last but not least, the Philips has a somewhat more generous colour gamut. So you may find it looks more vibrant overall.
I wonder if the samsung mu7000 hdr 1000 is just as good for £629?
I wonder if the samsung mu7000 hdr 1000 is just as good for £629?