Comes out as gay and within a week there are people saying he's part of an elite cult of paedos similar to rolf harris.
Christ
holy **** balls - and not a hint of sarcasm?!He was part of the Clinton pizza thing too, it's being talked about and it's all going to come out soon.
Also, Epstein was knocked off by Trump's associates as Epstein was about to out Schofield. Trump negotiated a prime slot on This Morning in exchange for Epstein being silenced. You just need to look in the right places, it's all out there if you do your own research.
He was part of the Clinton pizza thing too, it's being talked about and it's all going to come out soon.
Also, Epstein was knocked off by Trump's associates as Epstein was about to out Schofield. Trump negotiated a prime slot on This Morning in exchange for Epstein being silenced. You just need to look in the right places, it's all out there if you do your own research.
holy **** balls - and not a hint of sarcasm?!
holy **** balls - and not a hint of sarcasm?!
No, I think the apology is mine to make.You might want to check my post history.
Apologies though, yes, I was talking ****!
Edit: Though I'm quite proud I got the tone exactly right and I came across as one of those.....
There's not a facepalm big enough in the world for this.
He was part of the Clinton pizza thing too, it's being talked about and it's all going to come out soon.
Also, Epstein was knocked off by Trump's associates as Epstein was about to out Schofield. Trump negotiated a prime slot on This Morning in exchange for Epstein being silenced. You just need to look in the right places, it's all out there if you do your own research.
Telling someone that they shouldn't be offended when you laugh at them is a bit like punching someone in the arm and telling them that it didn't hurt.
Take their word for it, they know if it was offensive or not.
You have the bullying the wrong way around. "Offended" is a weapon, a means of asserting superior status. That's why "offended" only matters when the person using it as a weapon either has a higher status group identity than the person they're using it against or is claiming to be championing a higher status group identity. It's more like a bully punching someone and forcing them to apologise for hitting the bully's fist.
Not sure where you got that from.Ah, so by telling you that you've hurt their feelings then they actually hurt your feelings.
Expertly explained; you win, I concede etc etc.
Yes, this sounds like exactly the sort of thing Phillip Schofield would make up as a publicity stunt.
Not sure where you got that from.
Outrage is a tool, you only have to look around to see this. People don't just get offended, they "get offended" then start demanding people do what they want them to, otherwise they'll "get offended" some more, and start rabble rousing on Twitter and the other toilets of the internet.
Then there are petitions and people start losing their jobs and other assorted madness. Outrage is a tool, a weapon, a means of exerting power and gaining control.
It's bleeding obvious most of the time.
Even this thread is evidence that coming out could never be easy. Even moreso when you are in the public spotlight. The Gordon the gopher pictures and gay jokes / slang terms just show how there is a large homophobic mindset to contend with.
You see this is part of the problem. People are having a laugh and other people get offended by it because the subject is someone who is gay.
Telling someone that they shouldn't be offended when you laugh at them is a bit like punching someone in the arm and telling them that it didn't hurt.
Take their word for it, they know if it was offensive or not.
Barrymore was a surprise, but not Schofield or Tom Daley.
Wait, people are actually being serious in thinking he's not gay and it's all a publicity stunt ?
Dear lord this forum really does attract some 'special' types
People don't like having errors of judgement or outdated views pointed out to them, which is why they attempt to normalise and ridicule.