Piers Morgan on TalkTV gets one million subscribers.

Murphy said:
Someone credible saying something happened is proof. It's not very strong but in the absence of other information it's sufficient to make a judgment. It would be great if there was other information to either prove or disprove something but the legal system make judgments all the time on far less, when there's no other information to corroborate either statement in a rape case, for example, judges pass judgment on who's 'story' is more credible.
Click to expand...

Omid Scobie is not credible in my honest opinion, I wouldn't trust him to give me the time.
 
SexyGreyFox said:
I think he's talking in general to be honest, just because you want to nit pick his words doesn't count because he has definitely said it in the past.
They still have zero evidence no matter what we think of him, if they have take him to court.
Click to expand...

Bear in mind this isn't just about his character, if the judgement is correct, he's also committed perjury.

If you think he's just gone out to his drive and had a general rant at the gathered press without lawyers carefully going over every word, then i've got some magic beans that'll make a great Xmas present.
 
Last edited:
hudson86 said:
Bear in mind this isn't just about his character, if the judgement is correct, he's also committed perjury.

If you think he's just gone out to his drive and had a general rant at the gathered press without lawyers carefully going over every word, then i've got some magic beans that'll make a great Xmas present.
Click to expand...

In fact the Judge said that Morgan had committed perjury in front of the Leveson inquiry.
Yep, when you think about it, the speed that he gave that interview after the judgment says to me the statement was prepared well in advance of the judgment.
The very least that the MET should be doing now is prepare a case for the CPS in regards to his perjury.
 
hudson86 said:
Bear in mind this isn't just about his character, if the judgement is correct, he's also committed perjury.

If you think he's just gone out to his drive and had a general rant at the gathered press without lawyers carefully going over every word, then i've got some magic beans that'll make a great Xmas present.
Click to expand...

Yes and that's why I want Morgan on trial for it and it will be done once and for all and hopefully he can stew for a while.
 
Efour said:
"Hack" a phone
Click to expand...

Yes, "hack" a phone

dictionary.cambridge.org

phone hacking

1. the activity of using someone else's phone system without permission…
dictionary.cambridge.org dictionary.cambridge.org

Efour said:
Break open a door lock with a " key"

Lol
Click to expand...

If you enter someone's house even with their key and take something, it's still burglary if you don't have their permission.
 
Sorry i was more getting at the terminology adapted and used by the media 20 years ago however long its been used. its surely just comical to anyone from our generation.
I know sarcasm gets lost in transcript a lot here, some people being worse at detecting than others.

I'm off to hack the supermarket with my pin code
 
Colonel_Klinck said:
Here he is telling us how easy it was to get into people's messages, I have no doubt he did it, the guy has zero scruples.

Click to expand...

This isn't some smoking gun though, I expect you know that, this is in 2003 when it was basically common knowledge. It doesn't mean he did anything. You're also speaking in the present tense about something that happened 20 years ago when you say he has zero scruples. None of us are the same people we were 20 years ago. Piers Morgan debated against Alex Jones on gun control, he put the government to the sword every single day during Covid, yet you completely ignore all of that and act like he's some opposition politician you ideologically need to attack.
 
Roar87 said:
This isn't some smoking gun though, I expect you know that, this is in 2003 when it was basically common knowledge. It doesn't mean he did anything. You're also speaking in the present tense about something that happened 20 years ago when you say he has zero scruples. None of us are the same people we were 20 years ago. Piers Morgan debated against Alex Jones on gun control, he put the government to the sword every single day during Covid, yet you completely ignore all of that and act like he's some opposition politician you ideologically need to attack.
Click to expand...
The court ruling is the smoking gun.

You may want to politicise it as much as you want, it's irrelevant. The court case is relevant. The High Court ruled that he knew.

E: The evidence of the times that he knew was not contested, if it was false then it would have been.
 
Last edited:
adidan said:
The court ruling is the smoking gun.

You may want to politicise it as much as you want, it's irrelevant. The court case is relevant. The High Court ruled that he knew.

E: The evidence of the times that he knew was not contested, if it was false then it would have been.
Click to expand...

I'm sure he did know, but so did everyone in that industry at the time. My point really is just that it was 20 years ago. I'm not a huge Piers Morgan fan, I like some of the things he's done, but this just seems to be yet another politicised witch hunt from the same type of people who engage in recreational hate at every opportunity. If he's done something wrong then charge him.

Terminal_Boy said:
He’s a scumbag who’d sell his mum to a Bosnian snuff movie producer if it got him a few more viewers.
Click to expand...

Do you know him well then? These type of posts about celebrities you've never spoken to or met are so weird.
 
Last edited:
Roar87 said:
This isn't some smoking gun though, I expect you know that, this is in 2003 when it was basically common knowledge. It doesn't mean he did anything. You're also speaking in the present tense about something that happened 20 years ago when you say he has zero scruples. None of us are the same people we were 20 years ago. Piers Morgan debated against Alex Jones on gun control, he put the government to the sword every single day during Covid, yet you completely ignore all of that and act like he's some opposition politician you ideologically need to attack.
Click to expand...

So because its 20 years ago he gets a pass and is a reformed character? The man is a slimy scumbag, that he says some things that you or I might agree with doesn't cancel that out. He like plenty of other journalists would do anything to get a story to sell, they would ruin any anyone's life, he has zero ethics. Its people like him that have ruined journalism. He is up there with Kelvin MacKenzie.
 
Last edited:
Roar87 said:
I'm sure he did know, but so did everyone in that industry at the time. My point really is just that it was 20 years ago. I'm not a huge Piers Morgan fan, I like some of the things he's done, but this just seems to be yet another politicised witch hunt from the same type of people who engage in recreational hate at every opportunity. If he's done something wrong then charge him.
Click to expand...
What does the passage of time have to do with anything?

If there's evidence of others committing crimes they should be in Court.

That's not a witch hunt, it's the legal process.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom