Piers Morgan on TalkTV gets one million subscribers.

I have no idea what you do, but if you are saying the high court judge is wrong to say Piers Morgan knew about multiple instances of phone hacking, I don't know what to tell you.

Link has been corrected.
 
VincentHanna said:
I have no idea what you do, but if you are saying the high court judge is wrong to say Piers Morgan knew about multiple instances of phone hacking, I don't know what to tell you.

Link has been corrected.
Click to expand...

There is no proof other than the Judge says the other bloke sounds credible.
There is no proof to charge Piers Morgan.
Therefore it's what you believe Morgan is capable of and personally I think he did it but there's no proof.
 
The problem with Piers Morgan is that a lot of people, myself included agree with the general sentiment of his views. I think they guy is a complete idiot but that doesn't mean I don't agree with plenty of things he says overall. He will say them in an insensitive, incendiary and hyperbolic manner but that doesn't mean what he says isn't broadly true.

People seem to struggle desperately with this concept that someone can behave like a ******* and still have a point. They struggle to separate the man from what he is actually saying. Far too many people seem to think that if you agree with anything Piers Morgan says then you are a complete **** simply because Morgan behaves like one far too often.
 
fez said:
The problem with Piers Morgan is that a lot of people, myself included agree with the general sentiment of his views. I think they guy is a complete idiot but that doesn't mean I don't agree with plenty of things he says overall. He will say them in an insensitive, incendiary and hyperbolic manner but that doesn't mean what he says isn't broadly true.

People seem to struggle desperately with this concept that someone can behave like a ******* and still have a point. They struggle to separate the man from what he is actually saying. Far too many people seem to think that if you agree with anything Piers Morgan says then you are a complete **** simply because Morgan behaves like one far too often.
Click to expand...

People love to pigeonhole everyone these days. It's not enough to just dislike something someone said, you must hate everything they have ever said, hate their clothes, their wife, their children, their dog and indeed hang around outside their house chanting messages of hate.
 
He's just been on the National News denying he ever had anything to do with phone hacking because of that Judge.
I hope he brings a case against the Judge because he has no proof.
He then tore into Prince Harry :)
 
His ramblings about Megan this, Royal that, he wants to destroy the monarchy blah blah. I thought this was about the phone hacking, Piers?
 
People get locked up for years on nothing more than hearsay (circumstantial evidence).Morgan has form. You think Morgan didnt know the Iraq pictures were fake.? I fear for a lot of you.
 
How anyone can champion this thoroughly odious clown is beyond me. The sensationalist supposed leaked Iraqi torture photographs back in the early noughties was my big wake-up call to this individuals credulity. How on earth do they get the voice that they do? Says more about media establishment than anything else. Corruption ahoy!
 
SexyGreyFox said:
He's just been on the National News denying he ever had anything to do with phone hacking because of that Judge.
Click to expand...
Actually he didn't. What he actually said was that he had never hacked a phone and never asked anyone to hack a phone. He was quite particular about his words. I don't recall him saying he didn't know about phone hacking on his watch.
 
Last edited:
Hades said:
Actually he didn't. What he actually said was that he had never hacked a phone and never asked anyone to hack a phone. He was quite particular about his words. I don't recall him saying he didn't know about phone hacking on his watch.
Click to expand...
Yep, I noticed that too

Obviously Piers Morgan never hacked a phone himself. He was editor whilst it was going on though.
 
Piers Morgan, Alex Jones and the Tate brothers they both ramble on having digs at others. Not nice people.

Some things I agree with what they but as a whole there’s no compassion and they all speak to others like crap.

EDIT: oof op is permabanned.
 
Last edited:
Hades said:
Actually he didn't. What he actually said was that he had never hacked a phone and never asked anyone to hack a phone. He was quite particular about his words. I don't recall him saying he didn't know about phone hacking on his watch.
Click to expand...

I think you saw a 5 second clip.


It doesn't matter what any of us think about him there is zero evidence (at this point), it would be great to see him charged and go through court proceedings to see what actual evidence they have and let him have a well earned rest from us behind bars for a bit.
 
SexyGreyFox said:
I think you saw a 5 second clip.
Click to expand...
I heard the whole thing and just watched it again. He says he doesn't know how how one story referred to by the judge was gathered. His reference to he personally not hacking or asking for hacking refers to all of the other stories. He has been very specific with his words.
 
Hades said:
I heard the whole thing and just watched it again. He says he doesn't know how how one story referred to by the judge was gathered. His reference to he personally not hacking or asking for hacking refers to all of the other stories. He has been very specific with his words.
Click to expand...

I think he's talking in general to be honest, just because you want to nit pick his words doesn't count because he has definitely said it in the past.
They still have zero evidence no matter what we think of him, if they have take him to court.
 
SexyGreyFox said:
There is no proof other than the Judge says the other bloke sounds credible.
Click to expand...
Someone credible saying something happened is proof. It's not very strong but in the absence of other information it's sufficient to make a judgment. It would be great if there was other information to either prove or disprove something but the legal system make judgments all the time on far less, when there's no other information to corroborate either statement in a rape case, for example, judges pass judgment on who's 'story' is more credible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom