lol, meh, as long as the nutrition is comparable, which is according to that table apart from the protein level being lower, and as long as it tastes good I'm still interested if it's more beneficial to the environment along the entire food chain. Interesting the salt level seems a fair bit higher.
I wonder if the type of fats are healthier though when it's the plant based fat, vs that from meat.
I'm sure as V3, 4 and 5 come out they'll be able to improve on all aspects of the nutritional content.
“I wouldn’t define it as healthier, I would define it more as ethical,” she said.
The original Whopper clocks in at 660 calories (more than half of them coming from fat), 40 grams of fat, and 28 grams of protein. The Impossible Whopper comes in at 630 calories (again, half from fat), 34 grams of fat, and 25 grams of protein.
The Impossible Whopper does have significantly lower cholesterol — 10 milligrams compared to 90 milligrams — but has more sodium at 1,240 milligrams compared to 980 milligrams.
even for the impossible burger
so the comparative healthiness unclear .. .. they have, presumably been unable to replace fat by carbs, say, and maintain customer 'satisfaction'/satiation.
If the burger had twice the volume, say, but, with carbs, would that have been good. ?
Fat it itself isn't unhealthy though.I think they have been disingenuous with their impossible/imposter burgers,
if you look on impossible web site, they don't address the type of fat, and consequent health issues; I would have expected that vegan cookery was generally more healthy fat-wise, as, I would have thought most consumers would.
it's a bit like alcohol free/low drinks you expect the taste to be down, but you have a product, you can drive after drinking, and, if you are concerned by alcohol intake will address that.
I think they have been disingenuous with their impossible/imposter burgers,
if you look on impossible web site, they don't address the type of fat, and consequent health issues; I would have expected that vegan cookery was generally more healthy fat-wise, as, I would have thought most consumers would.
it's a bit like alcohol free/low drinks you expect the taste to be down, but you have a product, you can drive after drinking, and, if you are concerned by alcohol intake will address that.
isn't the animal fat advantage predominately on high heat cooking where they are no going to oxidise, become carconogenic to the same degree as vegetable ...
so I need to have the impossible/imposter burger rare.
Let's talk about how it's made. For starters, Arby's uses 100-percent turkey breast and rolls it up. "With a cheesecloth and plastic wrap, you're able to wrap it into that rounded cone shape that you get with carrots," brand executive chef Neville Craw told Delish. It's then smothered in dried carrot juice powder (aka where the nutrients and color comes from), and roasted for an hour.
I'm curious to know if you maintain such a stance against meat or any other food product. Do you vet the supplier of each and every single food outlet you buy from, for example?Agreed. But Id want to know what was in the burger first.