Is it bad that I actually want the above to be true?
My biggest bugbear with the current generation of consoles is the horrifically slow CPU's so it's sounding fantastic, even if it's only a low power AMD Excavator it should be a huge improvement. Intel i5 for me though ideally.
GPU twice as powerful but smaller? 290X on 14nm I wonder? or is it easy enough to go NVidia with a GTX 970? Intel/NVidia combination would be better suited to a console with limited cooling.
It was stated plainly and with no room for interpretation that there are developers that already have development kits for the PS4K and that they are making games that will directly target and take advantage of the higher specs of the PS4K.
Doubt they switch suppliers mid gen. Also i5/GTX970 at $499. Never happen
No one wants to partner with nVidia given how theyve treated Sony/MS in the past and they seem to have some growing pains (async compute) moving to DX12 after being focussed on DX11 optimisations and as for Intel its just too insignificant to even matter to them (dont think these contracts are that profitable compared to their day to day business)).You can get slower i5's which would still trounce AMD Jaguar for less than $200 and that's with iGPU that PS4 won't need, they could probably even buy failed i5's and have a triple core processor which would still be much faster. iirc AMD Jaguar is about dual core Pentium territory and that's only when all cores are used, hence most games struggling at 30fps due to low IPC.
GTX970 is $250 and that's with PCB/VRM's/memory etc, Sony only need the GPU by itself. It seems unlikely but then so is a faster CPU and doubly powerful (290X class) GPU from AMD without needing an AIO cooling system?
Yet he says earlier that they haven't even finalised the specs yet.
Uh huh.
If the GPU is really twice as powerful that's a hell of a lot more grunt they have to play with, and with the consoles being so close to the metal, people are in for a treat graphics wise.
Agreed. It could well be the difference between 30 and 60fps. Seeing as we should have been getting the latter from the get go, I'm not at all happy by this news. I'm still waiting for the PS4 exclusives to arrive ffs!
But they don't use off-the-shelf parts like you're suggesting, everything is specifically designed and manufactured for the console even if it's based on existing architecture.
They wouldn't entirely change the hardware anyway, seeing as they need to maintain 100% compatibility with the existing catalogue of games that have been designed specifically with certain specifications in mind.