Yeah CG-NAT is a bit of a downside - but so far I've not had any issues with it and any remote access I use my BT line.
This is encouraging. I am soon due to take ownership of a property which is yet to get FTTP (under build, but it dragged on for a couple of years at my current house). I need a temporary but acceptable medium term solution until that comes online, and the area amazingly actually is covered by an LTE cell.@ANDARIAL
A chap I've been doing some consultation work for has just installed an SXT LTE Kit as his home. He's copperless anyway but took his 10/1 WISP connection into a 70/33!
They are seriously good pieces of kit and we're yet to tweak it properly! You could jack it straight into a PoE switch and it would happily take over duties as your router.
The only issue we've come across is that as he's on EE they use a CG-NAT so remote access in for him for further tweaking was a bit of a problem, solved by a VPN tunnel to my AWS hosted CHR.
This is encouraging. I am soon due to take ownership of a property which is yet to get FTTP (under build, but it dragged on for a couple of years at my current house). I need a temporary but acceptable medium term solution until that comes online, and the area amazingly actually is covered by an LTE cell.
It'll be a bit of a shock coming from 1gbit symmetric fttp, but i hope will be very usable. The fixed phone network in the area offers <1mbit via ADSL only, so not even worth having BT install a line.
Yes i am thinking that the latency will be noticeable, our existing fttp is <3-4ms to London and offers >100MB/s (900+mbit) at all times symmetric. Luckily the new property will eventually come online with the same provider (the cabling is in the ground, but they took over a year to get ours online from this point at our existing).
I think that i will follow your lead on the SXE LTE device, this can be pole mounted as the property has a convenient tall pole anyway where the mains power supply comes in. I am hoping that it will pass as a usable family connection when fed into a normal structured network internally.
Speeds on an iPhone are fairly poor at ~12/2 at ground level, but i am hoping that this at ~25ft height will be a great improvement on a phone.
I read an offputting review of this product, although i agree it does look ideal on paper;If the LTE signal is marginal, go with the Mikrotik LHG LTE option over the SXT. It’s effective same modem in a bigger antenna with significantly greater gain.
At a first glance, this appears like the ideal kit for 4G home broadband - A combination of a 4G modem, router and high gain antenna all in the one unit. As there are no cable losses, the network cable can be much longer than the 10m max with coaxial cables and needs just one cable instead of two.
Despite having high hopes for this, it turns out the high gain only applies to the 1800MHz and higher bands, such as LTE bands 3 and 7. Here in Ireland, all 3 major mobile operators serve LTE on 800MHz (band 20) and 3G on 900MHz in rural areas. While this MikroTik LHG can work on these bands, the signal readings are a lot lower than what my current Huawei router picks up with an outdoor directional antenna on Three's 800MHz 4G band and the Internet connection was very unstable.
Initially I thought I had a defective unit as I tried a SIM from another operator (Eir mobile) and again got much better performance with my current router than this swapped back and forth on the mounting bracket, aimed the same direction. For example, I could only get around 2Mbps max with this on Eir Mobile 3G compared to around 8Mbps with the router and directional antenna. I don't pick up any signal on the 1800MHz 4G band or 2100MHz 3G band with any network at home.
I later took this MikroTik to my workplace in a larger town and did a temporary set up with a tripod. Unlike my home's rural location, this MikroTik works very well on the 1800MHz 4G band, giving around 50Mbps in a speed test and a reading about 10dB higher than my phone in the same spot on the Three 4G network. This means it should work well for those who live with clear line of sight of a built-up area.
I read an offputting review of this product, although i agree it does look ideal on paper;
Many thanks for the detailed reply there
I am trying to locate the applicable masts via cellmapper but i am struggling to interpret the data there, although at least can get an idea of where the masts actually are.
For the moment i think the plan is to take a regular Huawei type LTE router down there and do some basic tests with it as high as possible, i will borrow one from the office and i can test a couple of networks that way, too. I am sure that i'll get an idea of the performance and expected signal levels fairly quickly.
Of course, the pole has a 360deg view over the property and surrounding countryside so i would expect to have to carefully install a directional dish like the above.https://www.mastdata.com/ is ok for checking out locality to masts.
What you need to bear in mind is gain is like a torch with adjustable focus, the higher the gain, the more focused that output/receiving is. Great if you can point it straight at the transmitter however it also isolates the receiver where as a mobile device has lower gain omnidirectional antenna. I think my point is, if you get signal at ground level, don't put a dish up and expect awesome signal without panning it around a bit first.
You can also get some some very high gain Omni antennae. I’ve seen 20dBi pencil antennae advertised but these are generally good for reception only. On Transmit they tend to blast out so much noise they make all other signals worse.