The issue here isn't the audio transcoding, it's the subtitles leading to software video transcoding.Another thing to consider when transcoding:
- Audio transcodes are software only.
- If you need subtitles, it can be a *nightmare*
The issue here isn't the audio transcoding, it's the subtitles leading to software video transcoding.Another thing to consider when transcoding:
- Audio transcodes are software only.
- If you need subtitles, it can be a *nightmare*
Is that what the issue is. My NAS will be stuttering and saying it's at like 20% turn subtitles off and it's fine.The issue here isn't the audio transcoding, it's the subtitles leading to software video transcoding.
The issue here isn't the audio transcoding, it's the subtitles leading to software video transcoding.
Is that what the issue is. My NAS will be stuttering and saying it's at like 20% turn subtitles off and it's fine.
I worry a DIY Plex/NAS would be too power hungry, we use Plex a lot.
Got one of those, ended up in the drawer because it doesn't have all4 on it.Depends entirely on what format of subtitles your client can support.
If it can't support the format you've provided then it forces a transcode to "burn in" the subtitles.
"Fatter" clients like Android, Linux and Windows desktop clients and most Apple Devices can natively play e.g. PGS subtitles, but things like Roku and a lot of TV Clients won't necessarily (or have other restrictions e.g. they won't unless it's also receiving a certain audio or container format)
Edit:
If you want the best experience/least amount of hassle then a more expensive client like the NVIDIA Shield is still the way to go
I was listing them as two separate challenges - but it looks like the discussion has moved on and provided more detail hereThe issue here isn't the audio transcoding, it's the subtitles leading to software video transcoding.
Docker is generally a better bet as it's lighter on resources, allows multiple dockers to utilise GPU rather than just one VM pass through, but transcoding via either won't affect the majority of your stated usage (audio) as it's done via CPU. Visual quality, depends on which iGPU and GPU we are comparing, things have come a long way for each. The P2000 is based on the 10xx Pascal architecture, that's 5 generations old at this point, and the OS needs to support things like HDR tone mapping and that's basically linux. In all honesty, I wouldn't waste the time or money changing anything at this point, H265 is *finally* about to become a non beta option for transcodes, ironically just as the world is starting to move to AV1.I'm running plex in a virtual machine with a NVIDIA P2000 passthrough for transcoding tasks etc. Watch locally and remotely, but the bulk of the remote access is music.
How does the GPU compare with quicksync these days?
issue with 7700k is it won't support hardware encoding/decoding more recent formats either get a more recent intel chip or smash one of intels discrete gpus in there for some quicksync action otherwise it might be a little painfulHi there,
Wanting to make a very rudimentary pc to act as my Plex server to serve my family consisting of 4 people , something that can handle supplying at max 4k HDR films or downscale to 1080p for people with hd TVs.
What's the minimum spec you'd recommend to run this, would it need a dgpu?
I was thinking of looking for a 7700k or similar with 8gb ram would that do it or do I need more ooomph?
While technically correct, you seem to have confused AV1 support with being important. The 7700K is Kaby Lake, it's a HD630 iGPU, it'll do H264/H265 hardware transcoding up to 10bit (HDR tone mapping - under the correct OS) almost as well as the UHD630 that was the default recommendation for years for basically any Plex server where power efficiency was a priority. The only remotely useful thing that it can't transcode in hardware is AV1, which only became possible with 11th gen onwards and ARC. To put it in context, it's only this month Plex will move transcoding to H265 out of BETA, at this rate AV1 support is many years off, and anyone wishing to use AV1 would likely have clients that support direct play anyway, so why is hardware transcoding AV1 important?issue with 7700k is it won't support hardware encoding/decoding more recent formats either get a more recent intel chip or smash one of intels discrete gpus in there for some quicksync action otherwise it might be a little painful
um no theres still a bunch of HEVC that the 7th gen doesn't support and was not added until 10th gen or iris XEWhile technically correct, you seem to have confused AV1 support with being important. The 7700K is Kaby Lake, it's a HD630 iGPU, it'll do H264/H265 hardware transcoding up to 10bit (HDR tone mapping - under the correct OS) almost as well as the UHD630 that was the default recommendation for years for basically any Plex server where power efficiency was a priority. The only remotely useful thing that it can't transcode in hardware is AV1, which only became possible with 11th gen onwards and ARC. To put it in context, it's only this month Plex will move transcoding to H265 out of BETA, at this rate AV1 support is many years off, and anyone wishing to use AV1 would likely have clients that support direct play anyway, so why is hardware transcoding AV1 important?
This is a good example of seeing vs understanding. You see some missing capabilities in a matrix, I understand that commercial video (DVD/BR/YT/whatever streaming platform you like) only master/provide commercial content in 4:2:0, so there is no need for anything to support hardware transcoding of 4:4:2 or 4:4:4 outside of gaming, which is not Plex transcoding. Now please stop telling people to upgrade a 7th gen CPU to transcode content that simply doesn't exist, it's just sillyum no theres still a bunch of HEVC that the 7th gen doesn't support and was not added until 10th gen or iris XE
Supported Codecs
This guide is for developers who have applications written using Intel® Media SDK. Learn about oneVPL, the 2.x API continuation of Intel® Media SDK APIwww.intel.com