You are coming across as sounding very immature.Er, no i don't think so, 2 of us think you used a deflect and defend tactic, don't worry, others do it also, you are not the only one.
They want him to be a terrorist, it fits their narrative.I think my description was accurate, not sure what you are struggling with. He's already been sentenced to 20 years in prison for violence against the police...
They want him to be a terrorist, it fits their narrative.
They want him to be a terrorist, it fits their narrative.
Basically, any crime committed by a brown person is Islamic terrorism. I think that's how it works.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39580594
According to that link it is an Islamist.
And yes, let's all crack on whilst scumbags are now placing nail bombs in coach furniture, yeah lets just crack, deflect and defend tactic?
Coherent sentence.Time set another rod up.
Ok, sorry, you're right, I've missed a bit. Let me rephrase...Have you seen a photo of this man? I haven't seen anything showing him pictorially? Or are you making an assumption?
Based on what....?
How is that my fault if the BBC and many more called it wrong, if it is in fact wrong.you were going on about the same rubbish in the other thread about the football coach - which it turns out you were wrong about
Well done.Coherent sentence.
I am sure i caught the tale end of something about it being organized crime related, but i have not looked into it yet, I don't know how true it is though.did they find the reason yet?
How is that my fault if the BBC and many more called it wrong, if it is in fact wrong.
I am sure i caught the tale end of something about it being organized crime related, but i have not looked into it yet, I don't know how true it is though.
e: I'm talking about the coach attack as that is what i thought you meant, I don't know the full reason behind last nights attack.
I am sure that i have not said this is an Islamist attack, but i know what you are saying.The same thing happens everytime one of these incidents occurs
The Mouth Foamers on here are screaming "see! told you" as fast as they can type before anything at all has been established other than "something bad has happened"
Facts are all over the place at the start, because it takes some time for invesigations to find out what is actually happening or publish full statements, the rumours and twitter rubbish also hype this upto the maximum. The Rubbisher news channels also have started publishing these twitter things as facts. the BBC in that case are just publishing what the police told them, who I suppose at that stage suspected the wrong person?
I even see people on here moaning that the police cant get their facts straight like an hour after something has happend- its almost like maybe they need some time to you know actually investigate the incident ?
Most of the people on here you are wrongly assuming are apologists are just pointing out that its prudent to wait until a clearer picture about what is going on is available before attributing acts to terrorism. for a start you are achieving exactly the kind of hysteria that ISIS are trying to provoke
I'm already mixed up haha, i pointed out earlier that he was known to security services like the rest of the attacks have been, I know this does not mean it's Islamist, could be just a vendetta, he had a criminal record of violent crime.oh i meant the paris shooting.
i thought the bus attackl was a footbal thing?
Stop playing dumb, everyone can see this has all the hallmarks of Islamism.Ok, sorry, you're right, I've missed a bit. Let me rephrase...
Any crime committed by anyone is an act of terrorism perpetrated by an Islamist - likely brown - until proven otherwise.
Is that closer to how you process these things?