You see it was for this reason I separated IBM from Hitachi. And look at Hitachi's results!!!Mercutio said:120GB IBM Deskstar - wasnt right for a good long time (you could hear the head reset at random every now and again).
Not stopped me buying Hitachi Deskstar - they really are a very different disk
Currently have a Maxtor 200GB Sata thats starting to show the odd SMART error
And you are surprised?!? If you ignore the models that actually had the fault IBM wouldnt be doing too badly at all either...smids said:You see it was for this reason I separated IBM from Hitachi. And look at Hitachi's results!!!
I just wanted to point out to some people that always advise that its near on impossible to validate reliability through your own experience (still a valid point) - this poll cant counteract such a stance but still give a qualitative rather than quantitative statement over what could be the better hard drives to get presently...smids said:About the poll, I didn't make it to be scientific, just user input that people who are buying drives at the moment could see. I'm glad I did it now, as it does make you think about your next drive.
ps3ud0 said:Im just glad Ive never recommended Maxtor - the poll results arent actually scientifically accurate or significant, but make you think...
ps3ud0
I think actually that Seagate have been around the longest and are actually one of the largest manufacturer's around - they even recently bought Maxtor (last month). So compare Seagate with Maxtor and Maxtor are still poor quality.PeterNem said:Or it could be maxtor sell twice as many drives in which case they aren't actually too bad (purely specualtive, I have no idea about sales figures). Maxtors have a bad rep on this forum but on other forums people really praise them.
MY WORD!!! £2000?!?! How technology has advanced.monaco87 said:First hard disk that failed on me was a 5MB (megabyte!) CDC, 1983. Fortunatley under warranty as it cost around £2000 then.