You see it was for this reason I separated IBM from Hitachi. And look at Hitachi's results!!!Mercutio said:120GB IBM Deskstar - wasnt right for a good long time (you could hear the head reset at random every now and again).
Not stopped me buying Hitachi Deskstar - they really are a very different disk![]()
Currently have a Maxtor 200GB Sata thats starting to show the odd SMART error![]()
And you are surprised?!?smids said:You see it was for this reason I separated IBM from Hitachi. And look at Hitachi's results!!!
I just wanted to point out to some people that always advise that its near on impossible to validate reliability through your own experience (still a valid point) - this poll cant counteract such a stance but still give a qualitative rather than quantitative statement over what could be the better hard drives to get presently...smids said:About the poll, I didn't make it to be scientific, just user input that people who are buying drives at the moment could see. I'm glad I did it now, as it does make you think about your next drive.
ps3ud0 said:Im just glad Ive never recommended Maxtor - the poll results arent actually scientifically accurate or significant, but make you think...
ps3ud0![]()
I think actually that Seagate have been around the longest and are actually one of the largest manufacturer's around - they even recently bought Maxtor (last month). So compare Seagate with Maxtor and Maxtor are still poor quality.PeterNem said:Or it could be maxtor sell twice as many drives in which case they aren't actually too bad (purely specualtive, I have no idea about sales figures). Maxtors have a bad rep on this forum but on other forums people really praise them.
MY WORD!!! £2000?!?! How technology has advanced.monaco87 said:First hard disk that failed on me was a 5MB (megabyte!) CDC, 1983. Fortunatley under warranty as it cost around £2000 then.