Possible new tax for over-40s to pay for social care

As for this 40+ tax.

It's coincidence, of course, but it's not lost on me that the very first people to start paying this tax at 40, should it go ahead, were also the very first people to pay university tuition fees, and have student loans instead of grants. And they and their generation to be attempting to buy houses after prices had swollen to crippling levels. And face the worst recession in memory as they were starting their careers, and now another as they were starting their families.

The life and times of a millennial. I'm not confident it's any better for Gen-Z either.

Well, wouldn't it be Gen X getting hit the most? They make up the majority of un-retired over-40s.
 
People strongly against this tax.... are you happy to sell your home and leave nothing to your kids when you get old then?

I don't have kids, so yes. I also don't expect to inherit my parents house. If they need to sell it to fund their care then so be it. We need to stop this idiotic mindset that wealth and property should automatically be handed down upon death.
 
I don't have kids, so yes. I also don't expect to inherit my parents house. If they need to sell it to fund their care then so be it. We need to stop this idiotic mindset that wealth and property should automatically be handed down upon death.

Generational wealth is a helluva drug. I know people who've purchased expensive properties on the belief that they will eventually have a massive inheritance to pay it off.
 
I don't have kids, so yes. I also don't expect to inherit my parents house. If they need to sell it to fund their care then so be it. We need to stop this idiotic mindset that wealth and property should automatically be handed down upon death.

I can see both sides of this argument.

Get rid of inheritance - because why should person A be given a head start in life over person B just because their parents happened to be well-off (the obvious better upbringing aside)?
vs
Don't get rid of inheritance - where's the incentive to work hard and live sensibly/frugally/save for a rainy day when you might die tomorrow and it's all gone? You can't pass any on to your kids, so live for the moment, get into debt and if you fall on hard times then the state can pick up the bill.
 
I may have missed it in the article, but why just over 40s? Why not just introduce it across all age groups?

At 37, it kind of feels like the rug is being pulled at every opportunity.
 
Mandatory voting and/or assigning fines and taxes to not voting happens in dictatorships. Democracy also means the choice to not participate.

Fair enough, it was said tongue in cheek anyway. However choosing not to participate also means choosing to abdicate responsibility and to some extent criticism. I have voted in every GE since 1974 except one (1979 I was working in Spain). But then I am that generation born in 1952.

Not only that we also had all the best bands.
 
But they will all start paying it older than millennials will (at 40), so will have a lower loss to their lifetime earnings.

Provided the tax stays in place and isn't reneged at some point.

As it stands and assuming an equal distribution across each of the 15 years that define a generation, each year the number of millennials paying the tax will increase in share by 6.66%, whereas 100% of Gen Xers will be paying the tax as soon as it is implemented.
 
Provided the tax stays in place and isn't reneged at some point.

As it stands and assuming an equal distribution across each of the 15 years that define a generation, each year the number of millennials paying the tax will increase in share by 6.66%, whereas 100% of Gen Xers will be paying the tax as soon as it is implemented.
What are you arguing here? That it's worse to be a Gen-x paying for, say, 20 years than a Millenial paying it for 30?

If we apply a 20% 'youth tax' on people on their 20s, is that worse for 29 year olds, because they're paying it now, or 19 year olds who will pay it for longer?
 
Mandatory voting and/or assigning fines and taxes to not voting happens in dictatorships. Democracy also means the choice to not participate.

Im pretty sure Australia isnt classed as a dictatorship
 
Welcome to Britain, you must be new here? :p

I wonder if there's the possibility to opt out if you commit to offing yourself when you hit retirement age?

Fried breakfast every morning, pub lunch and a boxset binge in the evening. Hell, I might even save the state some money by dropping dead in my fifties.
 
What are you arguing here? That it's worse to be a Gen-x paying for, say, 20 years than a Millenial paying it for 30?

If we apply a 20% 'youth tax' on people on their 20s, is that worse for 29 year olds, because they're paying it now, or 19 year olds who will pay it for longer?

That it is worse for Gen X for the next 15 years, as literally that entire generation is paying the tax.

IF it is still going in 15 years, then Millennials will take the mantle, so your "The life and times of a millennial" comment is missing the mark a bit. But no-one seems to give a stuff about Gen X for some reason, haha.

And I say that as an "elder millennial" who will be impacted by this, but not for another 2 years.
 
Is the social care time bomb about to go off?

Feels like it.

I feel the older generation pension home owner generation also need to cough up.

If you own your own home but are retired how is it fair everyone else pays for you? You should pay for yourself too.

Id be happy with this if this money was used to pay for the generation contributing only.

Its not fair to give those who have had such great opportunity another reason to keep thier assets and milk off the younger generation.
 
Back
Top Bottom