Given the nature of most of his posts, you think that was the only thing he tweeted?
Ah the good old assumption argument.
If that's what you believe then fine.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Given the nature of most of his posts, you think that was the only thing he tweeted?
With games like Dying Light, GTA V and SoM more VRam is deffo better at 4k IMO.
AMD 4gb hbm with advanced compression tech will be the equivalent of 6-8gb ddr5.
That's hilarious
Gregster's been stalking Roy Taylor.. I think he did the right thing in blocking him tbh
I think you are missing the point people are trying to make (which is a very valid one). If this is a Titan X beating, behemoth of a card that people will be buying for 1440p and 4k gaming, 4GB is a pretty stingy amount of vram to have on the standard reference card.
AMD 4gb hbm with advanced compression tech will be the equivalent of 6-8gb ddr5.
No i did not miss the point, that's what the 8GB version is for.
It is the shades that do it for me
Anyways guys, I am not fussed and all good, so back on to this Fuji Fury X
Im pretty sure those 8GB 290 reviews showed them slower than the 4GBs.
I think that's actually a conservative estimate as we can definitely assume there will at least be the performance per shader of the r9 285 and possibly even better than that which would leave you maybe 1.6-1.7x r9 290x performance, which would destroy a Titan not to mention any HBM benefits, the question is pretty well how good are the drivers.
My understanding is the compression tech found in the likes of maxwell/tonga only compress when GPU is processing it, and so helps reduce the bandwith usage rather than how much Vram is being used.
Someone else might know abit more than me?
"Around the designated with the codename Fiji GPU are four stacks of video memory, along to this combination are the fastest graphics card in the world - said AMD vice president Matt Skinner a few minutes earlier."
"The two 8-pin connectors allow together with the PCIe slot theoretically a power consumption of up to 375 watts, but AMD's Graphics CEO Joe Macri said Golem.de that Fiji graphics card should not require more energy than the Radeon R9 290X. Thus, should the upcoming models remain at under 300 watts - possibly even significantly."
AMD clearly believe this is faster than the Titan X, unless they are pretending it doesn't exist. Titan X owners prepare to be dethroned (Means me as well ).
Supplement dated 3 June 2015 9:12 clock
We have the headline and intro adjusted because AMD's Matt Skinner was not talking about the fastest graphics card, but the world's liveliest Chip: "HBM Enables us to build the fastest GPU in the world", the Vice President said literally on the AMD press conference. ■
Im pretty sure those 8GB 290 reviews showed them slower than the 4GBs.
Glad im not the only one that thinks 8gb is not needed