• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cropped for you. :)

300series1.jpg
300series2.jpg

That's a big ass table :p
 
Something doesn't look right, at the bottom of the second chart ( which I just noticed is actually just an expanded version of the top chart :() the first furry the only listed as R9 390 future which appear to be a cut down version has more Pixel fill rate GP/s than the full fat furry.

Also the fact it lists the grenada/Hawaii rebrand as the 380x which goes against all the other rumours.

I'm reckoning that it is an old chart that is well out of date with the latest rumours.
 
Probably way off but why do I remember a few people, Ian Perry included saying Hawaii wasn't a full part lol. Not going to be though, it's the same die with a few improvements to performance per watt and efficiencies they've picked up over the last year or so with a bump in clock speed.

And it's funny Frieddie because it likely won't be all that great, so the price needs to reflect that.
 
Something doesn't look right, at the bottom of the second chart ( which I just noticed is actually just an expanded version of the top chart :() the first furry the only listed as R9 390 future which appear to be a cut down version has more Pixel fill rate GP/s than the full fat furry.

Also the fact it lists the grenada/Hawaii rebrand as the 380x which goes against all the other rumours.

I'm reckoning that it is an old chart that is well out of date with the latest rumours.

The fillrate isn't surprising if those specs are to be believed. both GPU's have 128 ROPS but the "cut down" version has a higher clockspeed.

EDIT: Per ref cooler above - please tell me AMD have actually bothered to try and improve it this time..
 
300 series reference cooler.

48JOfGt.png

lol :D

The fillrate isn't surprising if those specs are to be believed. both GPU's have 128 ROPS but the "cut down" version has a higher clockspeed.

EDIT: Per ref cooler above - please tell me AMD have actually bothered to try and improve it this time..

Of course they have..............they've added an AIO :p :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom