-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)
- Thread starter Boomstick777
- Start date
- Status
If the picture is legit then I doubt it requires it, it would probably never even hit more than 50% speed at full load. Though it's also possible that this is a prototype and they just put the best fan they could find on it for testing /shrug.
Man of Honour
Probably not
NVidia have probably known what the performance of the Fiji cards are for quite a while.
This also works the other way round as well.
NVidia have dropped a big clue as to what they think Fiji will perform at in the shape of the 980 Ti which does not have all it's shaders enabled.
GTX 980 = 5 TFLOPS
290X = 5.6 TFLOPS
Just saying...
It'll make a bigger difference to compute than gaming.
Again, a new GCN will also help there.
They are different.
The high speed ones like the one shown on the Fury have black blades/hub, different holes on the centre hub and a solid ring connected to all the outer blades to stop them breaking off at high RPM.
Last edited:
I really don't think that fan will appear on the production model (due to cost), it was probably just on the pictured prototype for testing purposes.
Even slowed to almost stalling speed it would hardly be silent (though much better than a 290X reference cooler ofc).
Even slowed to almost stalling speed it would hardly be silent (though much better than a 290X reference cooler ofc).
no need, once tuesday comes and we have the facts/prices a new thread will be made
Associate
- Joined
- 23 May 2006
- Posts
- 346
We probably still won't know how it performs though will we? Surely at best they will show it off, tell us it's amazing and give us a release date and possibly a price. Actual performance won't be available until the procut is launched, which is expected on the 24th, right?
Associate
Well the last leaked bench seems to be a fake..but funnily the questioned Ti and TX scores are legit
Real:
Supposedly fake:
Real:
Supposedly fake:
Soldato
Hence the need for separate news threads, but loyalists get their backs up when the discussion is taken away from their nattering.
Man of Honour
Well the last leaked bench seems to be a fake..but funnily the questioned Ti and TX scores are legit
Real:
Supposedly fake:
All total garbage
Look at the scores for batman 59 57 55 53 51 is there a pattern forming there lol.
And also a TX only 2fps faster than a 980 and 2 slower than a 980 Ti, they are having a laugh.
Soldato
The only other threads I've seen so far contained rumours, AMD haven't released anything yet, when the 16th arrives we'll know more.
Caporegime
I have two AP-31s for extreme benching purposes. 5400rpm is no joke.
Just one of those fans is louder than my reasonably loud vacuum cleaner. And sometimes I feel like not leaving one of them plugged and on a table because I feel like it would have enough lift to start flying.
I can't see how anything reaching those speeds would be used. Those fans are in the "actually dangerous" category lol.
Just one of those fans is louder than my reasonably loud vacuum cleaner. And sometimes I feel like not leaving one of them plugged and on a table because I feel like it would have enough lift to start flying.
I can't see how anything reaching those speeds would be used. Those fans are in the "actually dangerous" category lol.
It'd be a bit of a fail if the 16th is just a paper launch
You mean like it would be a bit of a fail if AMD spent the month running up to the 16th not promoting the card and essentially giving sales to the GTX980ti?
Remember which company we're dealing with here
- Status