Man of Honour
You can untick the box to list invalid results too.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)
- Thread starter Boomstick777
- Start date
- Status
You can untick the box to list invalid results too.
Associate
- Joined
- 1 Mar 2014
- Posts
- 2,419
Come on guys, what are the chances of someone having 2 of these with actual working crossfire drivers
*Pitchforks incoming*
Soldato
Caporegime
Well I did state that I expected it to trade blows with the TX and win some and lose some and I still stand by that.... Just release the damned thing already and put us all out of our misery 
Man of Honour
So basically 90% of AMD cards running without tessellation
ohhhh!
I think the old 290Xs are fantastic at Tessellation, if you have enough of them you can build a wall.
Caporegime
Come on guys, what are the chances of someone having 2 of these with actual working crossfire drivers
Slim to none.
Come on guys, what are the chances of someone having actual working crossfire drivers
There ya go mate, streamlined it by just a bit for improved accuracy.
Caporegime
Here is the actual Firestrike Extreme link for the pic in his thread, complete with username.
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5036776
Thats actually a really bad score all things considered, its 30% faster than my overclocked 290P, its what? about as fast as a stock 980?
It looks more like a water cooled 290X
Come on guys, what are the chances of someone having 2 of these with actual working crossfire drivers
To be honest this kind of a big deal. AMD need to make sure their driver support is good for these new cards. This is equally as important as their perfromance/price.
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,168
Caporegime
Its a strange one, all it says is unknown VGA 4GB @ 1050/500, clocks and VGA data can easily be cheated in FutureMark
There are 290X GPU scores of 7000 in Kaaps bench, 7% short of this score at 7500.
Is it possible to get a 290X to score 7500?
There are 290X GPU scores of 7000 in Kaaps bench, 7% short of this score at 7500.
Is it possible to get a 290X to score 7500?
Soldato
Those "Leaked" GFXBench results are total hogwash, Apparently the Fury X gets 102FPS in Manhattan and the Titan X gets 137FPS.
I just ran the Manhattan bench and got 217FPS with a single Titan X -
I just ran the Manhattan bench and got 217FPS with a single Titan X -
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,168
Looking at this score i would say highly unlikely unless they were cheating somehow.
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/1881364
Around 900 down on total score and 1000 on the graphics score. I doubt you will get much faster.
Last edited:
Caporegime
7000 GPU score. its close ^^^^^ better Drivers, run windows in skeleton mode... its just too close.
Still so much FUD coming from tech sites.... 6 Days to go.
Still so much FUD coming from tech sites.... 6 Days to go.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,168
Last edited:
Soldato
I got a graphics score of 9554 on my Titan X, IF and this is a huge IF, If these numbers are even remotely correct then AMD have just had a massive brain fart.
Caporegime
Right, not a good score then, about 20% ahead of a 980.
Thats nowhere near good enough, its a card that sits in between the 980 and 980TI. at least it will be cheap.
At 1440P it will probably be closer to the 980 than the 980TI, 10% faster than a 980.
If its right AMD have got nowhere.
Last edited:
- Status