• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well I did state that I expected it to trade blows with the TX and win some and lose some and I still stand by that.... Just release the damned thing already and put us all out of our misery :D
 
Kaapstad said:
Here is the actual Firestrike Extreme link for the pic in his thread, complete with username.:D

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5036776

fxJWzky.jpg
Click to expand...


Thats actually a really bad score all things considered, its 30% faster than my overclocked 290P, its what? about as fast as a stock 980?

It looks more like a water cooled 290X
 
Finners said:
Come on guys, what are the chances of someone having 2 of these with actual working crossfire drivers :P
Click to expand...

To be honest this kind of a big deal. AMD need to make sure their driver support is good for these new cards. This is equally as important as their perfromance/price.
 
Its a strange one, all it says is unknown VGA 4GB @ 1050/500, clocks and VGA data can easily be cheated in FutureMark

There are 290X GPU scores of 7000 in Kaaps bench, 7% short of this score at 7500.

Is it possible to get a 290X to score 7500?
 
Those "Leaked" GFXBench results are total hogwash, Apparently the Fury X gets 102FPS in Manhattan and the Titan X gets 137FPS.

I just ran the Manhattan bench and got 217FPS with a single Titan X -

Fdev17q.png
 
humbug said:
Its a strange one, all it says is unknown VGA 4GB @ 1050/500, clocks and VGA data can easily be cheated in FutureMark

There are 290X GPU scores of 7000 in Kaaps bench, 7% short of this score at 7500.

Is it possible to get a 290X to score 7500?
Click to expand...

Looking at this score i would say highly unlikely unless they were cheating somehow.

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/1881364

Around 900 down on total score and 1000 on the graphics score. I doubt you will get much faster.
 
Last edited:
7000 GPU score. its close ^^^^^ better Drivers, run windows in skeleton mode... its just too close.

Still so much FUD coming from tech sites.... 6 Days to go.
 
Last edited:
TheRealDeal said:
The other card is almost 8000 gpu score. For instance 8 pack with these clocks on a 980ti is not to far above.

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/4282539
Click to expand...

Right, not a good score then, about 20% ahead of a 980.

Thats nowhere near good enough, its a card that sits in between the 980 and 980TI. at least it will be cheap.

At 1440P it will probably be closer to the 980 than the 980TI, 10% faster than a 980.

If its right AMD have got nowhere.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom