Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

TheRealDeal · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:26

Dicehunter said:
I got a graphics score of 9554 on my Titan X, IF and this is a huge IF, If these numbers are even remotely correct then AMD have just had a massive brain fart.

What is your stock score. Remember stock is the comparison. A 20% OC on this card would be in the ball park of your Gfx score as 3dmark scales pretty good with overclock's.

Dicehunter · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:27

TheRealDeal said:
What is your stock score. Remember stock is the comparison. A 20% OC on this card would be in the ball park of your Gfx score as 3dmark scales pretty good with overclock's.

No clue to be honest bud, Haven't run stock clocks in years

RavenXXX2 · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:28

If that's the performance I'm not surprised AMD aint shouting about it.

humbug · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:29

RavenXXX2 said:
If that's the performance I'm not surprised AMD aint shouting about it.

It would be a complete flop wouldn't it, its basically a 980.

Loxa · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:29

Was it not a bad move on AMD's part having there Fury X GPU with only 4GB VRAM?

Ayahuasca · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:30

There's no way that's a legit score for their top card lol.

Dicehunter · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:31

humbug said:
It would be a complete flop wouldn't it, its basically a 980.

If it comes in at 2/3 the price of a 980 but with the same performance then that's awesome IMO

humbug · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:32

Loxa said:
Was it not a bad move on AMD's part having there Fury X GPU with only 4GB VRAM?

With 45% more shaders only scoring 20% higher than a 290X whats HBM even doing?

A GDDR5 GPU scales higher than that. lol.

TheRealDeal · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:33

Same setup with Titan X from Guru 3d with a Titan X. The Guru score is with a decent OC on the cpu where as the generic vga card is on stock cpu.

http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/nvidia-geforce-gtx-titan-x-review,22.html

In the Guru machine that Generic card would score way higher.

Any how not long to go and to much guess work going on here.

Dicehunter · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:35

humbug said:
With 45% more shaders only scoring 20% higher than a 290X whats HBM even doing?

A GDDR5 GPU scales higher than that. lol.

Can't be the real thing, If it was AMD would have literally just shot themselves in the foot.

humbug · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:35

Dicehunter said:
If it comes in at 2/3 the price of a 980 but with the same performance then that's awesome IMO

£300? they would not make much money on it.

RavenXXX2 · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:36

I'm calling BS on all these dodgy benchmarks, I'm still expecting the fury to be the undisputed fastest gpu come its release.

mururoa · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:37

Cheapest 980 start from £350 at European retailers right now.

humbug · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:37

Dicehunter said:
Can't be the real thing, If it was AMD would have literally just shot themselves in the foot.

It seems way off doesn't it?

But these slower than a 980TI rumours seem very very persistent, either someone getting more desperate in trolling the closer we get to release or something has gone very wrong with Fiji.

LoadsaMoney · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:40

Dicehunter said:
If it comes in at 2/3 the price of a 980 but with the same performance then that's awesome IMO

LOL absolute load of *****, be no good for 290 owners, be like going from a 290 pro to an X, you just wouldn't

Dicehunter · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:41

LoadsaMoney said:
LOL absolute load of *****, be no good for 290 owners, be like going from a 290 pro to an X, you just wouldn't

Good point

Dygaza · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:42

If these benchmarks are truly legit. I'm very impressed by AMD for getting equal performance without sacrificing DP performance like nVidia has done. For gamers it doesn't matter anything ofc. which raises question: Should they?

humbug · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:42

LoadsaMoney said:
LOL absolute load of *****, be no good for 290 owners, be like going from a 290 pro to an X, you just wouldn't

Its a good chunk more than that difference but its not great, more like a 280X to 290P

TonyTurbo78 · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:43

I'm sure something solid will leak before the 16th. To keep everything under wraps till then will be something, I'm half expecting the weekend we'll see the real deal.

Martini1991 · 10 Jun 2015 at 18:43

humbug said:
With 45% more shaders only scoring 20% higher than a 290X whats HBM even doing?

A GDDR5 GPU scales higher than that. lol.

It's got nothing to do with the VRAM.

Again, how are people going to judge HBM's success? People will praise it, and it could ultimately do nothing.