• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mayh3M said:
If benchmarks are to be believed it has around a 300 watt TDP which is only 50 more than the 980ti.

Although I doubt they take the AIO into account, which could add around 50 more.
Click to expand...

You're warmer, add a couple on to that.

r7slayer said:
How do you come to that conclusion? It only has two 8 pin PCI-e power connectors with a max of 375 watt envelope and it's been said same envelope power wise as 290x. So where do u keep getting those crazy conclusions from silent?
Click to expand...


Why do you keep mentioning this as if it's a hard limit? It's really frustrating when you're poking facts at me with a proveribal rod when you don't even understand what you are saying. This max limit is a theoretical limit imposed years ago. It doesn't mean a thing.

Just like you keep saying "it's been said", yet when I mention something that might not be to your liking it just can't be true. I don't recall saying it was over 375w anyway. It just happens to be pretty near it.

You obviously never overclocked Hawaii if you're struggling to come to terms with this.
 
Last edited:
300w is a lot still all my 290xs worked around 75-80C on air, and i could oc them well 3/3 above 1200.
AIO comes in play -> ocheadroom goes up.

I can totally imagine that they are fit in the 300w at stock, but with the 2x8 pin and AIO you can oc it very well.
 
Kaapstad said:
300 watts is a lot and worse still with the HBM chips packed around the core it is a bit toasty even before you start thinking about overclocking.

The AIO setup won't use much more power than an air cooled setup either. The D5 pumps on my custom loop only use 37 watts when absolutely flat out.
Click to expand...

Your right it won't add as much as I thought but it will definitely add some. And yeah I doubt these will OC anywhere near Maxwell levels.
 
BTW i find it interesting how opinions turn for some people...

When news came on the HBM many people was: "ah it can't be that power efficient..vram is only using a little bit of power.....amd is stupid"
Now: "Ah if its 300W with HBM its crap, because HBM uses a lot less power, so the chip is surely crap...amd is stupid"

Titan X release: "AHHH the performance awww (wetting panties)..power consumption is not that important yes its the same as a 290X but look at the performance wooo...amd is doomed"
Fury X matches the Titan X: " Eehhhh this is kinda ok ish..but not great...and it is not power efficient...it will be hot...ams is doomed..."
 
Mtom said:
BTW i find it interesting how opinions turn for some people...

When news came on the HBM many people was: "ah it can't be that power efficient..vram is only using a little bit of power.....amd is stupid"
Now: "Ah if its 300W with HBM its crap, because HBM uses a lot less power, so the chip is surely crap...amd is stupid"

Titan X release: "AHHH the performance awww (wetting panties)..power consumption is not that important yes its the same as a 290X but look at the performance wooo...amd is doomed"
Fury X matches the Titan X: " Eehhhh this is kinda ok ish..but not great...and it is not power efficient...it will be hot...ams is doomed..."
Click to expand...

AMD is way behind Nvidia when it comes to performance per watt. Its disappointing that this is still likely to be the case. Would prefer AMD made some ground in this department.
 
r7slayer said:
How do you come to that conclusion? It only has two 8 pin PCI-e power connectors with a max of 375 watt envelope
and it's been said same envelope power wise as 290x. So where do u keep getting those crazy conclusions from silent?
Click to expand...

My original Titan (8 and 6 pin connector) could draw over 450w when OC'd - go figure. :)
 
Mtom said:
BTW i find it interesting how opinions turn for some people...

When news came on the HBM many people was: "ah it can't be that power efficient..vram is only using a little bit of power.....amd is stupid"
Now: "Ah if its 300W with HBM its crap, because HBM uses a lot less power, so the chip is surely crap...amd is stupid"

Titan X release: "AHHH the performance awww (wetting panties)..power consumption is not that important yes its the same as a 290X but look at the performance wooo...amd is doomed"
Fury X matches the Titan X: " Eehhhh this is kinda ok ish..but not great...and it is not power efficient...it will be hot...ams is doomed..."
Click to expand...

This.
 
Silent_Scone said:
You're warmer, add a couple on to that.




Why do you keep mentioning this as if it's a hard limit? It's really frustrating when you're poking facts at me with a proveribal rod when you don't even understand what you are saying. This max limit is a theoretical limit imposed years ago. It doesn't mean a thing.

Just like you keep saying "it's been said", yet when I mention something that might not be to your liking it just can't be true. I don't recall saying it was over 375w anyway. It just happens to be pretty near it.

You obviously never overclocked Hawaii if you're struggling to come to terms with this.
Click to expand...

Well at least I can state facts about the fury card ur just stating stuff pulled from thin air. Also don't put me in the same boat as the ppl who keep posting positive articles and defending negative please as I've not been doing this just stating what I believe to be true from logical assumptions. You on the other hand have been assuming stuff from what I can tell from thin air. Oh a 1600 watts psu will cripple with three of these? Okay can't wait to see real power consumption now. Also when there is negative articles you seem to jump on these rather than positive so dont paint me in a picture mr when you painted your self in one first.
 
Last edited:
Who said power consumption isn't important? Pull the other one!

It's what made GM204 great when in MPGU configurations, and GM200 a like. Nobody wants to go back to heat boxes. These things are going to pack a lot of it.

r7slayer said:
Well at least I can state facts about the fury card ur just stating stuff pulled from thin air
Click to expand...

lol that's funny because I didn't think it was out yet. I have my sources, you don't have to believe it you can find out for yourself. I would highly recommend you read up on what enthusiasts and overclockers alike have pulled through 8 pin connectors. From what you're spouting at me you might be in for a huge shock, and it's a little transparent that you don't follow that scene as a result.
 
Last edited:
Kaapstad said:
No not at all, I am just being honest in how I see it.

I will be buying the Fury, will you.

What I do find small minded in these sort of threads is people who want one brand to beat another brand without giving it any logical reasoning.
Click to expand...

The logical reasoning for wanting amd ati to do better is because nvidia massively profit gouged this generation. And they lied to reviewers and customers re the 970. If AMD doesn't beat them, then nvidia will surely do this againin the next ggeneration.
 
I'll never understand bickering, personal insults, division, fan boyism and the general non ability to form differing opinions without any of the above - over a piece of plastic and silicone that hasn't even been released. Never :(
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom