-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)
- Thread starter Boomstick777
- Start date
- Status
Lol no clue !
Associate
- Joined
- 31 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 276
Awesome thanks!
This.
Anyone who is not a fanboy and has had AMD cards would agree. I am sick of the false promises
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 33,188
Should probably include the quote where Titan X/980ti/780ti users feel that even though frame rate is lower they find too much stutter using SLI in Witcher 3... a Nvidia game, with Nvidia features in with multiple drivers to deliver a 'game ready' experience. These drivers are also the ones causing loads of crashes for people.
I agree, and that is exactly what I am saying. AMD has matched Nvidia's gain with the performance per watt, so in all likelihood the AMD cards will still be a little behind Nvidia, just like the 290X vs 780Ti.
Did you see me complain at AMD's performance increase? No, I have just passed on the facts and let people realize what that actually means in reality.
The more interesting fact is Nvidia achieved the same icnrease as AMD did from a more efficient core to begin with, and di so without using HBM memory which has lower power consumtpion. that bolds well for the future.
From the consumer perspective it means there is now competition with AMD cards offering similar performance and similar power consumption at a similar price point. Can't complain at that.
You mean like frame times for SLI being ~2x those of CF? Worse in some titles. Have fun with that in VR, particularly. The gulf is so bad now that NVIDIA have forbidden the reviewers they gave FCAT to from using it in multi-GPU benches ... after having distributed the software in the first place to show a similar advantage they used to enjoy over AMD.
In terms of actual profiles, yes NVIDIA is usually quicker to release (for titles they actively sponsor particularly) ... but in new games that's completely irrelevant - Vulkan and DX12 support multi-GPU natively.
They're doing an event with PCGAMER but it's 2 or 3AM UK time I think.
Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 10,756
- Location
- West End, Southampton
better hope they get drivers working properly for crossfire then mate.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 9,221
- Location
- Knowhere
That's all I got from it, I don't know anything I didn't already really. Not anything that matters to me as a gamer,
Apart from it being 650 dollars but who knows what that will translate to once it's in Blighty and the release date which is still over a week away.
Associate
- Joined
- 10 Nov 2012
- Posts
- 2,380
- Location
- Northants
Now it's all in the hands of the driver engineers...
What was the release schedule mentioned if any? Had to go take a dump mid way through
24th June for Fury X
14th July for Fury
Not sure whether they put a release date on Nano.
Still comes down to gaming performance for me. Pricing looks good but it's nothing without fps figures!
- Status