• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
machinebummer said:
Sorry to ask this in this thread, I have the "SuperFlower Leadex Platinum 1000W Fully Modular "80 Plus Platinum" Power Supply"

https://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=CA-005-SF&tool=3

in my basket right now and thought I'd check before buying.

Will this be fine for the Fury X, I'm not sure if this has enough connectors?

Thanks
Click to expand...

It has plenty of connectors!

Connectors

- 1 x 20+4-Pin ATX12V/EPS12V
- 1 x 8-Pin EPS12V
- 1 x 4+4-Pin ATX12V/EPS12V
- 6 x 6+2-Pin-PCIe
- 10 x SATA
- 5 x 4-Pin-Molex
- 1 x Floppy
- Warranty: 5yr
Click to expand...
 
CAT-THE-FIFTH said:
Well,actually if you bothered to look at high end GPU cadences,outside quick refreshes,Nvidia has kept to at least 15 to 18 months between launches of high end GPUs.

Unless OFC you think they are willing to scrap a brand new GPU they designed within 8 months.

Plus,14NM/16NM is likely to be quite expensive too.

Its more likely we will see a GTX980 replacement but even that will be probably closer to the middle of next year.
Click to expand...

The 980 was released last September, so Q1 next year is bang on the 15-18 month schedule.
 
D.P. said:
Not according to Nvidia, if you know more than them you should tell them.
Click to expand...

They've said nothing of the sort. They've been extremely vague.

We know they won't go for a big die first ... they re-organised their SKU stepping for new architectures to avoid the fiasco they had with the cancelled 3xx line and then Fermi ever again. They launch small, sort production issues, then go bigger.

If you think they'll abandon that strategy with a new architecture, smaller process, and shift from bulk planar to FINFET, with completely new memory controller and new memory, then you're even more bananas than your posts hint at.

Moreover Pascal and the hugely delayed Volta were squarely aimed at CUDA / supercomputers ... they didn't think AMD would go for HBM this early and at this volume in consumer products / professional space.

For the BIG die Pascal, you will see Tesla long before Titan, per the original Titan. It wouldn't even surprise me if those big dies are still 28nm so they can deliver for some of the projects they have with IBM on time.

Also, TSMC have enough issues with their 16nmFF process, let alone the 16nmFF+ which is higher power and runs much bigger, lower volume chips -- if the former hasn't gone well, it's doubtful the latter will.
 
shankly1985 said:
That's fine we all different here. The vram though I disagree with.. You would more than likely run out of gpu power before you even use that up.
Click to expand...

There is always the exception.:D

Seriously 1 or 2 cards 4gb is ok in most situations.

3 or 4 cards and 4gb becomes a serious problem.

99% of gamers won't use 3 or 4 cards so 4gb on a Fury X is not a problem.

All GPU setups are a compromise even 4 way TXs where you have to sacrifice a tiny bit of speed for 12gb of memory.
 
mulpsmebeauty said:
Are you aware of stock shortages with the Fury X and is it down to AMD's lack of capacity or an underestimation of demand?
Click to expand...

Fury X will be in huge constraint for whole of June, July unknown.

Fury and Nano probably won't be released this month.

300 series 100's in my warehouse and 390 8GB is great value as it's a true rival to 970 with twice VRAM. :)
 
Wonder how well HBM scales at 8gb or 12gb. I presume that the 4gb is getting overrun at 5k+.

Assuming those benchmarks are legit(not sure how they could be).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom