Soldato
HIS 390X IceQ would be the cards I would prefer, I hope Gibbo puts it forward to HIS to make it possible.Kaapstad said:If Sapphire put a 390X chip under this cooler who will buy one.
humbug said:
Last edited:
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)
- Thread starter Boomstick777
- Start date
- Status
I can only assume that with the HBM on the same interposer they will place the whole lot under a heat spreader and with the size of these last gasp 28nm chips these things will be huge. I expect a bit of a redesign for the actual metal work in this type cooler but the shrouds should be very similar.
Those Vapour X ones do look good but they are pretty huge to be honest.
Those Vapour X ones do look good but they are pretty huge to be honest.
screw those coolers,
If it any cheap reference cards + full EK water blocks then i wont buy as this is the only way i roll
after going full custom water cooling i will never ever ever go back to air
^^^ This and then some!
Soldato
I'm sure if your able to fit a waterblock your capable of refitting the stock cooler for resale.....
Soldato
A nice reference cooler from amd would be nice for a change, i don't know if they got some kind of bulk deal on those red fans but they've been a staple of the cards for years now and more often than not when you see them you immediately know "noisy".
They really need to try harder in that regard as noise has been an issue back as far as the x1800xt series, its come and gone in varying degrees but they never seem to put much effort in on the stock cooler front.
AMD Preparing “New Graphics Launches Later This Quarter”
Read more: http://wccftech.com/amd-talk-graphics-products-quarter/#ixzz3XZSZCRPn
Read more: http://wccftech.com/amd-talk-graphics-products-quarter/#ixzz3XZSZCRPn
Associate
- Joined
- 1 Mar 2014
- Posts
- 2,419
Man of Honour
If Lisa Su goes to the toilet, Wccftech will write about it
I wish sites like Wccftech would stop throwing around specs which are almost definitely not accurate like the ones below.
But having said that I hope they realise that the 290X has 37.5% more stream processors than the 980 yet in most situations the NVidia card is faster.
The 390X has 33.3% more stream processors than the TitanX in that table now it does not take a maths genius to see where this is going ...........
More rubbish from Wccftech lol.
^^ Agreed.
Unfortunately rumor is all we have for AMD atm, hence the 'possible' in the thread title.
Hopefully AMD will get around to launching some new hardware soon. Meanwhile Nvidia is killing it in sales..
Unfortunately rumor is all we have for AMD atm, hence the 'possible' in the thread title.
Hopefully AMD will get around to launching some new hardware soon. Meanwhile Nvidia is killing it in sales..
Caporegime
I wish sites like Wccftech would stop throwing around specs which are almost definitely not accurate like the ones below.
But having said that I hope they realise that the 290X has 37.5% more stream processors than the 980 yet in most situations the NVidia card is faster.
The 390X has 33.3% more stream processors than the TitanX in that table now it does not take a maths genius to see where this is going ...........
More rubbish from Wccftech lol.
Doesn't work like that tho Kaap
The 285 has a 256Bit Bus and 15% less Stream processors than the 280X and its clocked 8% lower, yet is some games its as fast or faster, one or two its as much as 10% faster. in one or two others its no faster than a 280.
Tonga actually adds about 20% overall to the performance.
The 380X will probably be a Tonga revision 290X putting it roughly around a 980.
Last edited:
Doesn't work like that tho Kaap
.
The 380X will probably be a Tonga revision 290X putting it roughly around a 980.
i think you meant the 390X, if so it's not worth having then
Caporegime
i think you meant the 390X, if so it's not worth having then
I know what he meant
you can't add Shaders on top of the 290X to come up with its performance, the 290x is GCN 1.2, Tonga is GCN 1.3 and has about 20% higher performance.A GCN 1.3 290X would be around 980 performance, so GCN 1.3 390X with 4096 Shaders (+45% Shaders) would be whatever that results in +20%.
That's assuming GCN 1.3, there could be a GCN 1.4 with even more performance on the way, we just don't know but what we shouldn't do is calculate it based of shaders performance that has already been superseded.
Last edited:
i think you meant the 390X, if so it's not worth having then
No he meant the 380X which is rumoured to be a revised 290X architecture. The 390X is a totally new architecture which should be as fast or faster than a TX let alone a 980.
Permabanned
Pure speculation.
Soldato
I don't think there is anyway that we will be getting a 390x that matches or beats the Titan, as much as i would love this to happen, it's not. Then the price will show the difference.
I'm still getting one because it should be faster than a 980 and I can't afford the TX
I'm still getting one because it should be faster than a 980 and I can't afford the TX
- Status