• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Post Your 3DMark2K1/2K3 results here

Thought I should post my newer scores since my upgrade (still got the 9500-odd in 01 and 1200-odd in 03 from my old 2.8Ghz P4 and Geforce 4 Ti4200!)

3DMark 2001 SE:24239
3DMark 2003: 9625
3DMark 2005: 4527

Spec in sig
 
It would be nice to split the SLI scores as ATM the ORB does'nt.

Also I would sugest only allowing linked results as the ORB does have some amount of security built into it to stop fakes.
 
ricco said:
It would be nice to split the SLI scores as ATM the ORB does'nt.

Also I would sugest only allowing linked results as the ORB does have some amount of security built into it to stop fakes.
Click to expand...

There's no reason why the ORB should.

It's relevent in forum-based charts, as otherwise the SLI scores will fill up the top 10, stopping the single-card hardcore overclocks from getting a look in. The ORB, though, lists all entries.
 
ricco said:
I believe that the ORB will eventualy filter for SLI, atm it does'nt.
Click to expand...

An option to show only single card scores would be very handy, if that's what you're referring to, and I'm sure it'll come in the near future. But I really don't see it separating off SLI and single card scores into different sections per se - after all, it's just about running a benchmark as quickly as possible, by whatever means!
 
Yes Filter option for single/SLI cards as said already.

I know its all about as fast as possible to some, to others its about checking if their setup is on PAR or something is wrong (drivers/setup/config)
 
funkyphantom said:
nice scores m8, but that processor is holding you back a bit
Click to expand...

Theres something more than the processor holding you back a bit. You only beat me by Two points running a 6800Gt and you are about 400 below me when I had the Ultra ;)
 
Fireblade2K4 said:
Here are my latest scores, these any good for my setup?

3DMark01 - 17937 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8444194
3DMark03 - 11954 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3765596
3DMark05 - 5456 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=642312

FB
Click to expand...

What drivers did you use?



**edit - ignore me, I thought you were using a 3000+ winchester...**


The '03 and '05 scores look okay, assuming you were using the 66.93s. The '01 score however should be much higher (say, 23,000ish). '01 is very CPU and memory bandwidth dependent, so this could indicate that you perhaps don't have everything set up properly.

Did you have any other tasks running in the background? Did you install your chipset drivers?

Also, on a side note, have you tried pushing that 3000+ further? I'm sure it can do more than 2.1Ghz :D
 
Well I used the 71.84 drivers on '03 and '05 and 66.93's on 01.

I have got the latest nVidia chipset drivers installed also, tasks running in the backgroud were firewall, antivirus, spyware sweeper etc....nothing memory hungry like Yahoo or MSN messengers I closed those before the tests.

I have got my CPU to 2.25Ghz previously by changing FSB to 215Mhz as the processor is multiplier locked and that does improve the '01 score, not tried it on '03 or '05 overclocked.

I just think that '01 is very CPU dependant, the '03 and '05 scores look about right to me so not too bothered about those, would like '01 to be higher though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom