Post your panoramas!

From the summit of Ben Vorlich. Sadly quite an overcast day, but that's the luck of the draw.

4616569173_644cf2f8fb_b.jpg


4617327996_2f69952f03_b.jpg
 
Couple from a stroll in the woods this weekend... woodland photography is something I find ridiculously difficult after years of shooting minimalist seascapes; stupid damn trees everywhere!

Cornish bluebell woods are too beautiful not to shoot though :)

Dapples_II_by_HairyToes.jpg


Dapples_I_by_HairyToes.jpg
 
Last edited:
Snap dude :cool:

http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/8739/dscf0348sn.jpg[IMG]

I have this on canvas at 4ft wide in my room! (cant find the enhanced version in this pc for upload) Probably my favourite shot ever.[/QUOTE]

[URL="http://www.flickr.com/photos/janesyb/4747233738/in/photostream/"][IMG]http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4137/4747233738_2fd3d9f928_z.jpg[/URL]

Double snap :p

Really wish I took a Panorama now, the view from Glacier Point was stunning.
 
Last edited:
Quick question: Should i be shooting manual or is it ok to use Av? And if i am using Av, would i need to adjust the exposure meter? Or will the difference in exposure between shots be fixed with the program i use to stitch it together? (In my case CS5)
 
Quick question: Should i be shooting manual or is it ok to use Av? And if i am using Av, would i need to adjust the exposure meter? Or will the difference in exposure between shots be fixed with the program i use to stitch it together? (In my case CS5)

You can get away with using Av. The exposure will only be out by an exact amount on a scale where 1/3 of a stop is the smallest difference between values. So, as long as you haven't got auto ISO turned on aswell, it should be easy to match the exposure and look if you are shooting RAW. Slight differences might still be noticeable if you use JPG.
 
Back
Top Bottom