Soldato
Civic works out around 146bhp/ton, and the Mx5 is around 115 bhp/ton.
They both seem really low figures. I need something quicker
They both seem really low figures. I need something quicker
Power to weight ratio of your car?
- Thread starter Overlag
- Start date
Man of Honour
1500kg, 410bhp last time it was on a rolling road. 273bhp/tonne.
Soldato
Nissan Frontier SE 3.3l V6
Wait for it....
100bhp/Ton
1697kg
170bhp
Wait for it....
100bhp/Ton
1697kg
170bhp
Associate
335i
385bhp 1600kg
240bhp/tonne
Was a passenger in a 833bhp/tonne Koenigsegg ccxr at the weekend... and I can well believe the figure
385bhp 1600kg
240bhp/tonne
Was a passenger in a 833bhp/tonne Koenigsegg ccxr at the weekend... and I can well believe the figure
Soldato
How does a manufacturer only get 170bhp out of a 3.3l V6?! Ford was getting that kind of power out of a 2.5 V6 15 years ago!
Associate
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2005
- Posts
- 1,194
Lotus Exige
710kg currently but aiming for about 680-690kg
285bhp but should be 320bhp by within the next few months
Current power to weight is 401bhp/ton but final will be 470bhp/ton
710kg currently but aiming for about 680-690kg
285bhp but should be 320bhp by within the next few months
Current power to weight is 401bhp/ton but final will be 470bhp/ton
I'm not being sarcastic. Engines produce a twisting force (torque) that is pushed through a gearbox (gearing) that drives the wheels. Virtually every motor vehicle is set up this way. A Mazda RX-8 gets its performance from the torque and the gearing. A Suzuki Hyabusa gets its performance from the torque and the gearing. A Volvo FH16 750 gets its performance from the torque and the gearing.Unsure if you're being sarcastic or otherwise?
Performance comes from many factors, so a willy-waving BHP/ton is pretty moot unless you somehow develop some way to represent gearing, torque, drive systems etc.
Oh wait, we do, it's called 0-60 times
BHP/ton is reasonably effective at representing performance as the simplest factors in acceleration at 'regular speeds' are 1) weight and 2) power, with that being ultimately derived from the torque and the RPM.
0-60 times are a pretty poor performance metric, unless you exclusively do lots of random full bore standing start launches to 60. It's too heavily influenced by drivetrain, the spacing of 1st and 2nd gears and the shifting speed of the gearbox. More interesting would be something like 50-100 for regular cars driving on regular roads.
Caporegime
Wow does the F10 really weigh 2 tonne.
It's a fat boy. Doesn't feel it though!
Where did you get 2040 Kg from? Just it's 1945 Kg including fuel, oils, driver, personal luggage etc. on BMW's site... http://www.bmw.co.uk/en_GB/new-vehicles/M/m5-saloon/2013/technicaldata.html
Soldato
1973 1303 beetle, 208 BHP/tonne... 
Lots of fun.
Lots of fun.
Soldato
Hi there
Not sure latest update, but figures to be confirmed but looking at:-
385BHP
1300kg
296BHP per tonne. E46 M3 Road/Track car!
Because of you, I can't stop looking at E46 M3's. I hope you're happy.
Soldato
beats me, I wonder how many of those 170bhp are left at 168k miles too... I fully imagine this engine was built to last forever more than power
Soldato
Probably built and tuned for torque and reliability.
Because of you, I can't stop looking at E46 M3's. I hope you're happy.
Buy a cheap but OK condition one for 5k, then spend that much again and turn it into a monster.
In all seriousness there are some gems for 6-9k region, also a lot of dogs too.
Soldato
I had my car weighed today and 2 weeks before was on the rolling road, so thought I might as well post on here.
'97 Vauxhall Astra
1220Kg (Full tank of fuel)
354bhp
290bhp/ton, that'll do me. For now
'97 Vauxhall Astra
1220Kg (Full tank of fuel)
354bhp
290bhp/ton, that'll do me. For now