Power/Weight Thread

Continued on from discussion started in Road Cycling thread....

Sorry I'm just crap at explaining myself. From my understanding, FTP isnt something to train towards, its a baseline of power that determines your zones at your given fitness level, its a rough equivalent to your lactic threshold for people that dont train in labs i.e. normal people. Its good to train and improve your threshold power but as you say, that doesn't win races if you are so inclined unless you are perhaps a TTer.

TTE is an extension to FTP, which is the point at where you fail to hold your FTP through fatigue. You use TTE to understand where your fatigue level is in time and use training plans to extend that time, I doubt many people can genuinely hold their 20min flat out FTP for an hour unless you TT a lot, so your power will probably drop off say 40mins in, so you train to make sure you can hold that power longer which improves your TTE.

Through your training you build up your power profile (strava power graph for instance) and you train specific areas that you require improvements on by working the appropriate zones that comes from your FTP. So if you want to be able to sprint well, you work to be able to maintain your maximal power output for say 20 -30s so your power graph to maxes out for 20 to 30s before dropping off. If you want to be able to improve your power so you can jump the gaps on a break away, you train your 1+ min power so you can make the jump etc. Its all metrics to to provide zones with which to profile your overall performance to show you where you need to improve for a given discipline, not that FTP or TTE is a training goal in itself.

Bear said:
Hopefully someone more knowledgeable will come along and put me straight if I'm way off the mark :o

You are not in any way off the mark, you are spot on. PDC and TTE and working to those is not a replacement training method, as you say, it is an extension to the traditional training based off an established FTP figure. The main point to take away and change logic wise in peoples heads is that FTP is absolutely not whatever number you can actually do/been modeled to do for 60mins. So the idea of doing 20min tests regularly and then using a calculator to get a perceived ability for 60mins is dead as that's a very one-zize-fits-all estimation that does not accommodate a riders strengths/weaknesses or training ambitions.

A few guys mentioned it all being a bit serious and harder to track. I did 100% agree on this in terms of WKO4 being expensive and very involved as is a coach to do so for you, but I think other than the cost of money & time required it is not too extensive or over the top for anyone with a power meter who is training for competitive reasoning. IT allows a far greater insight to your abilities and what abilities you need to train across the whole spectrum, rather than focusing on pushing up a number you have simply calculated from a half a perceived effort.

I didn't know he was going to do this but my coach just posted this to Facebook with a video he done as well. Gives example of the adaptions and sessions we are incorporating just now and how they have improved elements of my ability. I done this 1x60mins he speaks of in the spoiler below last Thursday and done another 1x60mins on Monday night and went 8w higher again. I'll move onto some lower time similar efforts then do another block and move onto again longer sustained efforts over an hour once I can get back outside on the good bike regularly and this will populate the PDC vastly and allow us to concentrate on very very specific areas to get me where I need to be (dunno if video will work):

https://www.facebook.com/100000117812088/videos/1698587260155185/

Coached rider Dean Cunningham is now in full swing preparation for the 2017 time trial season. Last week Dean popped down to my office on his travels and performed his last session of the extensive aerobic phase. The aim with Dean is to really light a fire in his engine and make the most of his limited training time.
Today's session was a gradual 20 minute warm up followed by a consistent 60 minute effort. This 60 minute effort focused on part of the power duration curve with needed maintenance. We knew exactly what average watts we needed for the 60 minutes to bring it up to line with our training phase focus. Dean has hit a few consistent 40 minutes efforts in this watt range and this session was interesting especially when looking at the relationship between power and heart rate. I wanted to see what heart rate did once past the 40 minute point. Will it start to de couple and drift ?
The answer was no it stayed coupled with power. Even to the point where Dean managed to pick up power in the final 10 minutes and easily power past the set target.
Once the data was uploaded we saw the power duration curve move. Not only did it improve at the targeted 60 minute point. It also pulled up the curve all the way out to 74 minutes and the curve to 32 minutes.
mFTP went up 6 watts and TTE extended by 7 minutes.
With Dean we have achieved real strength in depth in this phase and you can see from the video how powerful he is looking. Dean is racing 10 and 25 mile time trials and he has outstanding fatigue resistance over both event durations.
What excites Transition as a coaching team is the fact Dean has not touched any threshold work. He is now achieving peak powers from 30-60 minutes with a whole boat load of energy systems to cause adaptations ahead of us.
It's safe to say Dean is doing himself proud and covering all based ahead of the 2017 season.
 
SoliD;30498108 said:
200W then you whippet? :D

:p:p
273w for 60mins on Sat.
300w for 20mins on Weds.
Shows you the CP20 * 0.95 really is just ballpark as I reckon I could test at 310w just now for 20mins but doubt I could get any more than 275w for the full 60mins.

This is all indoors mind you so would be good to do the same outdoors and see how much these would increase.
 
SoliD;30498120 said:
Some great numbers! You'll be flying this season, especially on the lumpy stuff. Got your aero better yet on the TT bike?

:D It's coming together nicely but definitely need transfer that onto TT bike in aero position.
Funny of you to mention, I took a wee video after fitting my new TT saddle last night and got some screenshots. I sent them to my coach for opinion but I am going to post them over in the aero thread just now so you guys can give me some help and advice please :)
 
I hate this new forum I find it hard to see where there are new posts so I've missed these!

Did you get Vector 1's touch? I find the same as you by the way, when I am pushing hard on the pedals I always always get 50/50 but when spinning away I end up putting 1-2% more through the right pedal.

SoliD - WKO4 is a learning curve. 2 weeks you'll just be getting hang of it there is so much to it! For a free trial absolutely get it downloaded and give it a bash it will give you very good information on the mFTP and the TTE model data alone so it's worth trying it.
I tried it out and even I felt out my depth after customising and mucking around with Golden Cheetah for so long. I ended up quite happy uninstalling after the trial and using the simple mans TP Premium in the browser and continuing with GC. My coach is doing everything in WKO4 though for me so I really didn't even need it or to worry about it but I couldn't help seeing it for myself. When I went down and seen him he took me through a lot of things on it and it's insanely powerful if you learn it and take the time!
 
Touch - I was horrified having to move to Keo cleats but now wouldn't go back, I far prefer them! Changing is the pain but they are good.
Torque wise, I doubt it. My V1's and V2's both just get chucked on and tightened to "tight" without any much more thought haha. Have you updated their firmware? If you don't have the ANT+ dongle for PC to do the firmware I have one and we can use it do update yours any time just let me know.

SoliD - GC just seemed a lot more customisable UI wise to me so I could strip it right back and re-build with all the data presented how I wanted across what screens I wanted. WKO4 is a lot busier and locked in, so I struggled with it. The trial via TP is 2 weeks for members, so give it a bash and see how you get on. Nothing to lose! Even if it it plots your TTE and gives you a mFTP it has been a worthwhile task as those are handy information to have and it will be accurate/relevant to your training the second you fire all your data into it.
 
Definitely update the firmware!
They are to be done pretty tight. My Keo 2 Max on the bike on the Kickr I basically do just beyond finger tight with allen key but I do the Vectors pretty damn tight... This is because I didn't do them tight enough at first and had some funny play going on which annoyed the Vector 2 pedal pod and it moved round and was contacting my foot (this issue wasn't possible on Vector 1's). So I now put the pedals pretty damn tight but not excessive at all and I do the bolts on the pod damn tight also so nothing moves at all and they are fine.

Disconnect the pods for a few mins, reconnect them and do the whole spin up to 85RPM nonsense again to calibrate the angles. Then do the unclipped calibration. After you do the firmware that is. They should be 100% after that. If not I seriously would be troubleshooting your head unit I think.
 
@xdcx update peoples data in first post numbnuts! ;)

Only you, Roady, could ignore the actual template used by EVERYONE to post their data and then hotlink it to ****.
I've updated you on page 1 and I am on my way to Herewherever to slap your wrists.

I am doing a 20min test at 17:00 just so everyone can prepare for the tremors that may be felt across the globe.
 
I demand live streaming!
Didn't see your post till now. Some of us bugger off home at 15:55 you know! :p

20mins = smack on 5w/kg. 10w increase since last one 6 weeks ago.
There is another 5 watts there just now, it was a poor test as I was either hammering 101-103RPM or 89-90RPM on bigger gear. Need to look at changing resistance manually on the Kickr I think as my happy place is 94-98RPM which is a hell of a more efficient.
 
Strong!

I can't remember where but I was reading quite an interesting article or post about the effect of higher RPM and aerobic load. Over 100 or under 90 doesn't feel great for me either, leaning more toward the lower end of 90.

It is very individual but for me (and probably yourself by sound of it) at <90RPM my leg muscles are grinding and taking a hammering. V02 system is fine at that. I finished that 20mins last night and my legs were screaming but my HR was about 10BPM lower than I would expect and my lungs recovered instantly, dare I say I didn't even feel I had worked hard.... During the first few mins of >100RPM though my HR was rising faster than I would wanted and my breathing was hectic as the lungs and V02 system are taking the hammering and your leg muscles are idling. 94-98RPM is the sweet spot for me to utilise both systems most efficiently.
 
310w was my watts for 20mins @ 61kg just now. I will be racing around 60kg and well on track for 320w 20mins in 6 weeks. The problem for me is laying that down in 10's. The goal this season will be >300w for a 10 and aero gains where possible. I reckon that's more than good enough for sub 21 this season. >5W/KG is superb, if you can match it with position. Super aero and that power is sharp end at majority Scottish races.

I have entered Dunfermline and Suie dude. Hopefully one of them will give me an entry! My climbing is nowhere near a patch on previous years but my power and strength is way ahead... so it's a matter of conditioning which is much easier to achieve when the founds are there. Have you entered Dunf/Suie?
 
I entered Elgin last night also :)
Going to Wolverhampton to celebrate Jesus moving a big rock and eating chocolate? :p
Which app you using? The Apple only one I can't remember the name of?
 
lol - https://www.facebook.com/contador/posts/10156737134990312

Historical tests from Mr Contador. On a hill @ 62kg.
I was always of the impression a genuine GC contender at a Grand Tour would be pushing 6.4. Just my take from seeing Froome's published data of recent years along with snippets from elsewhere and the Lance Armstrong film where he mentions 6.4 being that magic number.

Ignore the comments on FB by the way. A bunch of muppets are commenting like this is a test Contador just done but these are done when he was actually racing before retiring of course.
 
Those are good numbers @thepeteh
What are your times for 5k/10k running?
What TT's and RR's are you doing in your area? You would be super handy with those numbers.
 
8 weeks back after 11 months of no cycling at all and I am back to 4.68w/kg for CP20 test.
Lost near 11KG since tail end of June now and power going up and up.
 
Running 10k's sub 38, 5k's sub 19 - My form isn't great but I push hard!
Done a lot of TT's this year (9 opens), and our local club courses as part of Wednesday evening league around North Yorkshire, bagged 4 or 5 course records so going very well. Done a 25 in 49:57 (r25/3h) this year and 50 in 1:54:04 on a 'slow' Yorkshire course. So it's been a cracker. Did have a 100 booked but had clashing family commitments , hoping to sneak one in ASAP!

I had a 4.65 FTP last year so right in line with you and done 5.65 for 24mins. This was 2 years after stopping running and my PB's were 15:44/33:00 although I was in low 32 shape just never got the course/weather combo.
I seriously think you should keep focusing your 5-9hrs per week on cycling and dedicate to that rather than squeezing tri training into that. You will do very well TT'ing (as you already are).
 
1min = 488w - 8.20w/kg
5min = 368w - 6.18w/kg

On local climb last night.
CTT and BC Scottish HC's upcoming on this weekend.
 
Back
Top Bottom