Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 17,616
- Location
- Bristol
The same image reasons apply to most youngsters...
And mjt isn't young and hasn't said that is friend is young, so your point falls flat on it's face.
The same image reasons apply to most youngsters...
And mjt isn't young and hasn't said that is friend is young, so your point falls flat on it's face.
She wanted something small and cheap. I was illustrating the point here how expensive common and 'cheap' cars are over here.In that case...why'd he spend some much on a piece of rubbish, at that price even the Mitsu and your Volvo are better.![]()
The problem is that EVERYONE in NL has a bloody caravan, and therefore almost every car will have a towbar. It's unavoidableMost medium cars in England dont have tow bars and when i see one that has i dont buy it.
I dont care if a fiesta has a tow bar because you know that hasnt done any heavy towing.
How you cant equate your slipping clutch and the tow bar = used for towing is beyond me.
Registration tax is power, annual tax is engine size.snowdog said:And the tax definitely does... In Belgium the tax is based on the power of a car.
She
The problem is that EVERYONE in NL has a bloody caravan, and therefore almost every car will have a towbar. It's unavoidable![]()
No but I question his opinions most, he's nearly the opposite of me trying to convince me I am the one who is wrong, in pretty much any situation.
Because imo that is fast, and it is a nice upgrade from what I have atm ?
If I want faster for my budget I either have to drop requirements ( and go for scooby or similar) or significantly increase my budget, I can't be arsed with both.
I'm losing nothing at all over the Volvo but gaining comfort and speed.
Errr, again, a wild assumption.
Quite frankly, it sounds like some of you guys have ZERO experience at all with buying older cars. And are avoiding them purely for the fact that they're, well old. For us ( as in my family), the habit is to buy cars 10-20 years old, buying a younger one was only a one time exception, you are all acting as if all old cars are money pits, whereas looking at all our current and previous cars, they definitely aren't...
Please, come off it. OcUK is not picking on you. Loads of us who are being critical are hardly rocking about in new brand 60 plate I10s. I am the poster child for buying old, rusty **** cars. Even I can still take a step back and be critical, why can't you?
That was indeed a but stupid the spraying comment, but there is nothing wrong with speeding and luckily I and many other will get our way as they are about to raise the speed limit on motorways here thanks to the much improved political climate.Nope, that's still pretty much the entire forum. Two examples I can think of are when you said something along the lines of anyone who pays over £1,000 for a total respray is an idiot because you have can drive to Poland, get it stripped, sanded, preped and sprayed all within a weekend for pennies, and the other was when you were almost bragging about speeding/racing people. It wasn't just Fox lining up to give you a kicking on those occasions, this thread is no different.
For me it is fast and it is a nice upgrade. Glacially slow is a 1.0 liter car that struggles to keep up on the motorway, not a car that can cruise along fine at 90 mph...But it's not really. You're moving from one glacially slow car to another. For someone who has claimed to be all about speed, this isn't really a "nice upgrade", is it?
Because I HATE saving money, and I'm crap at it. I'm bored of my Volvo and the Galant would be something new.So basically, you can't afford the car you want? Why not do what most people do in such a situation and just save more money? Is your Volvo is on it's last legs? Obviously not if you're going to be keeping it for the next 3 months in case the Galant turns out to be a shed.
That is your opinion, the Galant felt a lot faster to me and especially the power at low revs was very much improved over my volvo which I really have to rag to get to the power.But you're gaining such little "comfort and speed" it is barely worth considering. You're also gaining a rusty nail of a car that may hold a plethora of unknown issues.
It is to early to say that now though. My car was cheap and the issues were what, a 10€ thermostat and 11€ gear bearings ? The previous owner didn't really care but I have no issues with it, It should be fine for at least a couple of years still.No. It is not. Old Used cars very rarely do not have hidden issues, An old used car that is a 1/4th of the average selling price of a good example is BOUND to have something up with it.
Please, come off it. OcUK is not picking on you. Loads of us who are being critical are hardly rocking about in brand new 60 plate I10s. I am the poster child for buying old, rusty **** cars. Even I can still take a step back and be critical, why can't you?
Is Joshy going to hide back in his hole once The Fox returns?![]()
sry dont mean to pee u off cos i know ur getting hammered on ur thread but i was just curious why a sporty lookin car had the towbar
.snowy. says (6:34 PM):
sporty loking car
skeet says (6:34 PM):
looks like one to me, i mean it isnt a average lookin car imo
.snowy. says (6:35 PM):
which is why i wont evemn go furtehr into this
skeet says (6:35 PM):
obviously its personal preference cos its visuals
lol k
You have got an endless supply of those apt pictures havent you![]()
That was indeed a but stupid the spraying comment, but there is nothing wrong with speeding and luckily I and many other will get our way as they are about to raise the speed limit on motorways here thanks to the much improved political climate.
Because I HATE saving money, and I'm crap at it. I'm bored of my Volvo and the Galant would be something new.
That is your opinion, the Galant felt a lot faster to me and especially the power at low revs was very much improved over my volvo which I really have to rag to get to the power.
It is to early to say that now though. My car was cheap and the issues were what, a 10€ thermostat and 11€ gear bearings ? The previous owner didn't really care but I have no issues with it, It should be fine for at least a couple of years still.
Because the criticism seems to be I should have spent more, while I'm happy I got what I wanted for far less than I wanted to spend.
Simply said, he's drawing more attention to himself, and others draw the attention to him, I remember VARIOUS threads and various comments by him ( in threads I haven't even posted in just lurked in) while I never really heard or remember anything by ''joshy'' before.You're sort of missing the point though? You do have a number of (for a lack a better, less polite word) "misguided" view that clash with the majority of the forum, not just with Fox, so why single him out?
So you reckon I should buy the exact same car but the 200bhp t4 version instead ( they start from 3k...)?Of course you are bored of the Volvo. It's a Volvo! And not one of the mildly interesting Turbocharged versions either. However it is a cheap car that you know well.
What is a marked improvement then ? A 2003 Mondeo Ghia 2.5 ? I see that in the exact same league..."Wanting something new" is just about the worst excuse for changing a car. Certainly when you are young and don't really have the cash monies to buy something that is a marked improvement. This thread proves this.
No, I just said the idea of a 2.5v6> twin turbo ( not a VR4 base model) is tempting ( having seen conversions about on the net), but I doubt I'd ever modify a car in such a way. But it's interesting in the same way as one guy converted his 2.0 V40 into a 2.0T with 230 bhp... It's too much hassle to do it.It's pretty much your opinion too. You don't even own the car yet and you're already looking into bunging the VR-4 lump in it...
I'm not getting rid of anything just yetWhich really does beg the question - Why on earth get rid of it if you can't afford anything significantly better!?![]()
Yes, of course, otherwise I wouldn't consider buying it...This might be the case, but do you honestly not see why you are getting the criticism? Do you honestly look at those pictures you posted and think "Damn, that's a nice car"?