• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Q6600 not Prime stable @ stock :o(

Associate
Joined
21 May 2004
Posts
239
Location
Southampton
I have a G0 Q6600 on a P35 DS3P with 2Gb Ballistix 8500. Running Vista 64bit (fully legit i'd add!)

The ram is running at stock with 2.2v as is the CPU @ 1.325v.

Under prime the whole system locks up before completing the first step.

What could be the problem?
 
Temps at idle are around 35 using core temp. Using games and 3dmark etc temps head up to about 55. With Prime95 the temps barely move to 40 before it locks. According to the CPU load gadget it does indicate that it is taking on the iterations before it locks.
 
Thought the stock V core for the GO Q6600 was something like 1.235V

Try Mem 1-1

mem at 1.9v (+.1v)

north bridge at 1.9v (+.1v)

V core at 1.3v

clock at 8X 400 =3200

mem @ 4-4-4-12

Just try the above settings and see how they go, have set up 3 DS3R's on those setting, with Go Q6600's and they all worked prime stable, with Balistix 5300 1gb x 4
 
Last edited:
Thought the stock V core for the GO Q6600 was something like 1.235V

Try Mem 1-1

mem at 1.9v (+.1v)

north bridge at 1.9v (+.1v)

V core at 1.3v

clock at 8X 400 =3200

mem @ 4-4-4-12

Just try the above settings and see how they go, have set up 3 DS3R's on those setting, with Go Q6600's and they all worked prime stable, with Balistix 5300 1gb x 4


The stock v-core (according to CPU-Z) is 1.325 for my chip.

My Ram's stock voltage requirements are 2.2v and timings are 5-5-5-15 according to Crucial.

I've given the northbridge an additional 0.1v already.

Isn't the point that this chip should run at stcok without issue? Let alone 3.2GHz?

This is a new CPU from OCUK btw.
 
Well this looks promising (well kind of! LOL).

I'm writing this whilst it is performing the small test. Are you thinking my RAM is more likely to be to blame?
 
Back
Top Bottom