• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

R9 Nano Review thread

I have the "GTX 970 Coil Whine" but the only reason i can hear it clearly is the same reason you can hear it on some of these Fiji cards, the rest of it is so dammed quiet...... < oh the pain!!!! why me????? :rolleyes:

its also not the first whiny card i have had, it happens, you get used to it to the point where you don't even hear it anymore.

Its all a big fuss over nuffi'n :p

I think that was my point Humbug ;)
 
Not really, AMD stated low Fury X stock was due to the cooler, not HBM/die availability. Especially considering how bat**** crazy everyone went due to the pump whine. Not surprising there is more nano stock than FX.

And this ones too small :D
 
The DisplayPort to HDMI 2.0 adapter have been promised by lots of people for a good while now.

CES 2015

At CES 2015 in Las Vegas, VESA featured multiple demonstrations that illustrate the power and flexibility of DisplayPort and related standards. These included

•DP-to-HDMI 2.0 Legacy Adapter – DisplayPort is designed to provide backward compatibility for existing display types. This video adapter converts DisplayPort 1.2
to HDMI 2.0, driving a 4K@60Hz monitor with full 24 bit video.

http://www.vesa.org/news-events/press-kits/

That was back in February, and I cannot find any info on whether they actually showed one or not.

If they don't get here soon, they wont be needed as the next gen cards will be here with HDMI 2 and USB type C instead of DisplayPort (probably as well as).
 
Not really, AMD stated low Fury X stock was due to the cooler, not HBM/die availability. Especially considering how bat**** crazy everyone went due to the pump whine. Not surprising there is more nano stock than FX.

I thought it was the HBM, then the interposer etc

Now it is the cooler? Pfft
 
For all the negativity on the nano and what it should have been etc..... I don't see a single 970 Mini thread.

tommy has linked to it a couple of times now
as I mentioned in response to him, the difference between the 970 mini and the Nano is that the 970 mini was announced by a couple of AIB's and is priced comparative with a regular 970

on the other hand the Nano was announced by AMD on stage at E3, has had a couple of rounds of press since before being released... AMD did nothing to set expectations on price, just saying that it would be "faster than a 290X"... so people expected it to priced accordingly

AMD wanted all the publicity and hype and that has resulted in a lot more discussion than what happens when one AIB releases a non-reference card

e.g. EVGA have just released a 980ti FTW... it got mentioned in maybe a handful of posts inside the 980ti thread, but as it wasn't announced on stage by nvidia themselves with a load of hoopla and slides saying how great it would be, it hasn't kicked up a load of controversy... the kingpin edition however did generate a fair bit of conversation with their whole ASIC pricing model (which again revolved around how compared to any other 980ti their pricing was bonkers)
 
Last edited:
For all the negativity on the nano and what it should have been etc..... I don't see a single 970 Mini thread.

That's because it's a niche product and 99 times out of a hundred you can fit a bigger faster card in your build. Same goes for the Nano, The only time it's a winner is that 1 time when nothing else would fit and the Nano has now taken the crown from the 970 mini.
The 970 mini has now been replaced as the go to itx card unless you must have Nvidia but it's such a small segment of the market place that every other time when you can fit a bigger card than the Nano you will choose something else.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom