Caporegime
I'll download it and up load it without that music
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
All of this unoptimised driver talk, How does anyone here actually know if they ain't? I am interested to know from cards are released to 2 months after how much performance cards really gain from driver tweaking. My guess is nothing significant.
If there was no Polaris-specific code in the drivers, the cards wouldn't work.Put it this way, why would the current public released 16.6.1 and 16.5.2 drivers contain code for Polaris based cards?
Yea, you're in no position to be confirming stuff like this man. Just stop.There is literally no Polaris optimised path code or code for the new hardware features in the current public beta or stable drivers.
If there was no Polaris-specific code in the drivers, the cards wouldn't work.
Yea, you're in no position to be confirming stuff like this man. Just stop.
Apparently official Polaris drivers went out directly to reviewers yesterday, the driver enables the new hardware features that are not supported in earlier drivers. That means the 3dMark scores using 16.5.1 etc were not showing the RX480's true performance.
@ fs123, the music in that vid.... listen to it, rulz.....
The cards still need to be supported, though. The fact that people are showing that their system, through Radeon or GPU-Z or whatever recognized the card as an RX480 shows that there is code in there for Polaris.Fall back to a different code path, you can run tonga optimised codepaths on hawaii hardware and likewise. the hardware is not that drastically dissimilar. But you do get a performance difference when the right code path is run on the correct hardware.
The cards still need to be supported, though. The fact that people are showing that their system, through Radeon or GPU-Z or whatever recognized the card as an RX480 shows that there is code in there for Polaris.
Either way, you are in absolutely no position to be confirming that there is no Polaris-specific optimizations in these drivers. That's pure hearsay at best, so please dont go spreading it as truth. There's enough BS flying around as it is.
Lots of confusion today. That tweet referring to the 4800 series is implying greatness yet we see some videos which make the 480 look like a 390.
We know this from who?What we do know is AMD are handing out a new driver to reviewers.
Could or could not.This could have a lot of performance enhancements just like any performance enhancing driver.
Because they obviously cant stop leaks. They've shown that they've got very little ability to control leakages given everything we've seen so far. So in that situation, you dont deny everybody the proper drivers and have everybody leak out disappointing information, you take control of the leaks by at least dripping out reasons for people to get excited.Just a quick note about the drivers and why AMD wouldn't release drivers with their cards.
Why would they? If they wanted to stop leaks the only way they can do that is to control the drivers.
Nope, the only thing ever indicating this was theoretical performance based on base performance plus super overclocks with a 1:1 clock/performance improvement ratio. No actual performance benches were being shown to indicate 980Ti-like performance.And look at the last few days on this site, there were leaks showing that 480 to be nearly as fast as the 980ti.
If someone can replicate that on a comparable card and post it we can get the performance comparison for that game at least.
Whose up for it?
I would but don't have the game.
Not for the $200 card he didn't. He said for the 8GB model.
Again, RRP *includes* a profit margin. So it's not before profit. Yes, OCUK will want to take a little extra due to added shipping, but it's not before profit.
That is good news. If a small IT brick and mortar store can hit £212, then it will be easy for Gibbo to hit £200
Small stores tend to sell at cost to try and win market shar or just list product and break nda to try and get exposure, then they never get stock!
Our pricing will be competitive, hoping for lowest in market and free shipping.