Does show how far we've come with relatively mainstream casual racism tbfSouth Park taught us that diversity is needed for "Operation get behind the..".... yeah I probably can't link that video.
Does show how far we've come with relatively mainstream casual racism tbfSouth Park taught us that diversity is needed for "Operation get behind the..".... yeah I probably can't link that video.
They need thickos who will fight for 'queen and country' aka frontline fodderFrom the original article (my italics)
"Admiral Sir Tony Radakin... said this was not "about wokefulness. It is about woefulness. The woefulness of too few women. The woefulness of not reflecting the ethnic, religious and cognitive diversity of our nation." "
Anyone know what that means?
From the original article (my italics)
"Admiral Sir Tony Radakin... said this was not "about wokefulness. It is about woefulness. The woefulness of too few women. The woefulness of not reflecting the ethnic, religious and cognitive diversity of our nation." "
Anyone know what that means?
Most high ranking navy officers are, I know one who crashed a nuclear submarineIt means he's trying his damndest to be an admirable Admiral and making himself sound utterly ridiculous for a high ranking naval officer.
From the original article (my italics)
"Admiral Sir Tony Radakin... said this was not "about wokefulness. It is about woefulness. The woefulness of too few women. The woefulness of not reflecting the ethnic, religious and cognitive diversity of our nation." "
Anyone know what that means?
No it doesn’t. Any idiot can join. I did.It takes hard work, fitness, intelligence and dedication to get into such roles but people will not see that in future.
No it doesn’t. Any idiot can join. I did.
In the days of equality it seems no.Surely the colour of your skin or birth genitalia are irrelevant? All you need to do is identify as a wheelchair bound gay transgender black Asian woman from Eastern Europe and you're guaranteed a job!
I don't get why it would bother you? Removing the gender from unnecessarily gendered roles removed any stigma that they may be 'male only' roles. And let's be honest the RAF is hardly a macho man force in the first place.@Mad_Jay
Yep, been out 2 years now, got out at 12 as the cons list was beginning to significantly outstrip the pros. I work in exactly the same team I did when I was in so work alongside a lot of "Aviators", and I make sure to take every opportunity to rib them about how insane things are in the RAF now.
Cant say "manned" anymore, must say "crewed".
The title "Airman" has been changed to "Aviator"
The ranks that include "aircraftman" in their title (AC, LAC/SAC) have been changed to Air Recruit/Air Specialist.
This is just the official stuff, the stuff that goes on behind the scenes with woke warriors (especially in training establishments, where things should be most strict) boggles the mind.
That's precisely why I got out. (2001-2010).the cons list was beginning to significantly outstrip the pros
Lol, the vast majority will never aviate, except when on a kite to take them somewhere crap for a few months, or like me, aviated as a past time.The title "Airman" has been changed to "Aviator"
That's ridiculous! For the female form, we used SAC(W) or Senior Aircraftwoman and the like. It worked and the ladies didn't complain.The ranks that include "aircraftman" in their title (AC, LAC/SAC) have been changed to Air Recruit/Air Specialist.
A former colleague went off to work as an RTS Instructor (bet it's not RTS anymore as it's too Military and abbreviate-ary) at Halton and she needed to teach recruits how to eat with a fork and knife! I worked at a Phase 2 training base for a few years, and you could tell in the early 2000s that recruitment of any kind was an issue, so they were taking anyone who applied. The calibre of recruits perfectly illustrated just how much they were scraping the barrel to meet quotas.This is just the official stuff, the stuff that goes on behind the scenes with woke warriors (especially in training establishments, where things should be most strict) boggles the mind.
The specific changes don't bother anyone exactly, but they're absolutely canaries in the coal mine and the tip of the iceberg when it comes to a wild lack of focus on the things that actually matter for the RAF's mission. That is unless becoming a Stonewall champion/great place to work is something you believe should override effective generation of air power. I can't say too much without getting people in trouble, but rest assured that the RAF is absolutely worse than it should be, given their resources, and everyone that's in knows it. To focus on the specific changes I mentioned is to miss the point, it's the fact that effort was spent there when the rest of the service is unfortunately a relative shambles. This isn't to say that the RAF, other military branches or government departments are managed perfectly or were in the past, it's just a comment I'm making based on the context of the thread, my 12 year service and continued contact with those who serve.I don't get why it would bother you? Removing the gender from unnecessarily gendered roles removed any stigma that they may be 'male only' roles. And let's be honest the RAF is hardly a macho man force in the first place.
Understood, thanks for sharing!The specific changes don't bother anyone exactly, but they're absolutely canaries in the coal mine and the tip of the iceberg when it comes to a wild lack of focus on the things that actually matter for the RAF's mission. That is unless becoming a Stonewall champion/great place to work is something you believe should override effective generation of air power. I can't say too much without getting people in trouble, but rest assured that the RAF is absolutely worse than it should be, given their resources, and everyone that's in knows it. To focus on the specific changes I mentioned is to miss the point, it's the fact that effort was spent there when the rest of the service is unfortunately a relative shambles. This isn't to say that the RAF, other military branches or government departments are managed perfectly or were in the past, it's just a comment I'm making based on the context of the thread, my 12 year service and continued contact with those who serve.