In the real world
I say! You're not allowed to be sensible here!
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
In the real world
whos paying over 1k for 60fps, is everyone selling their high refresh monitors or something.If these cards with fsr can hit 4k60 with Rt , are they a failure?
Actually youd be wrong. There are games that actually look better with DLSS thanks to TAA being blurry as heck. Cod black ops for example, native rendering was absolute crap.
I dont think anyone can honestly say they are a failure. They are just totally different proposition than 4xxx. Focused on raster and HRR. Its not a bad thing. For people with 1440p wanting 240Hz its probably even better proposition than 4090, regardless of price.If these cards with fsr can hit 4k60 with Rt , are they a failure?
Edit: bearing in mind most gamers with 4K panels won’t have high end, high refresh rates / are probably using a tv
Seriously tempted to get the XTX and put it in my 2nd PC.
I know with my sig card this is getting stupidly expensive but I'm saving £6k a year in commuting costs (including income tax hit) so that's my justification
exactly times when you will be punished for byuing what you want/can afford are gone this forusm is full of crazy setupsNobody needs to justify anything mate, you buy what you want
@Jimmy Weirdarms I think it’s largely because we are on an enthusiast forum, so if they aren’t physically winning in performance then they have lost… from what they showed the 4090 will still be the performance King.
In the real world they potentially have a much better proposition here than Nvidia, and I think it will force Nvidia to re-evaluate their pricing strategy for the mid range.
I’m curious about the low clocks, especially given the abundance of rumours about high clock speeds. Perhaps when the power budget goes out the window with 3rd party AIB cards there’s some decent headroom for pushing those clocks up… perhaps had AMD done it themselves it wouldn’t have fit with their efficiency and performance per watt narrative.
As always we’ll have to wait for the cards to come out and see how they compare. Not quite the slam dunk I was hoping for personally, but I’m always in need of as much performance as I can get and not the typical use case… I think I’ll be holding off until Jan or feb next year and see how everything settles out. Particularly interested in whether AMD has managed to close the gap a bit on VR performance where they’ve historically been weaker than in traditional gaming.
Exactly. 1440p is only just hitting the mainstream, that's where all the sales are. Of course the wealthy, performance people will be disappointed but the other 99.99% won't care.I dont think anyone can honestly say they are a failure. They are just totally different proposition than 4xxx. Focused on raster and HRR. Its not a bad thing. For people with 1440p wanting 240Hz its probably even better proposition than 4090, regardless of price.
This doesnt mean they are not a slight disappointment. After 2 years of design AMD will now have wider gap to Nv in RT. They have also been massively overhyped by youtubers and twitter leakers.
It’s all theoretical until we get some real side by side comparisons but *if* AMD have reached 3090(ish) levels of RT and raster somewhere near nvidia’s latest (within 20%, say), at 60% of nvidia’s price and 75% of the power draw, then surely that’s all the better for everyone?
whos paying over 1k for 60fps, is everyone selling their high refresh monitors or something.
Sounds like a step backwords
Be careful, you will soon be called Nvidia troll by certain individuals here for calling this BS out!It's Poor Volta levels of BS that leakers fed people for months and months and it's already starting again - AdoredTV claiming RDNA4 will be more than double RDNA3 performance and beat Nvidia in RT
Seriously tempted to get the XTX and put it in my 2nd PC.
I know with my sig card this is getting stupidly expensive but I'm saving £6k a year in commuting costs (including income tax hit) so that's my justification
It is native. And i dont really care what you or nvidia wants me to think. Games have built in taa and dlss is an improvement over that. Period. Everything else is fanboy drivel and i want no part in itYou proved my point with this comment. The fact you consider the utterly blurry and crap TAA “native”, is what Nvidia want you to do.
Buy what you can afford. Ignore a lot of posters on here as there are all sorts of agendas in play, never feel the need to justify anything.
Margins have gone up too dude, the profit scraped off the product... that is exploitation driving that element its not simply to pay for the increased cost of manufacture, R&D etc that is money banked for the business and its shareholders.Ooooooh... massive price increase... just because your wages haven't tracked with exchange rates and inflation... are NOT the problems of these companies - they are the problems of your governments and beyond. Get your head on straight and look at the wider world.