If they get +50% performance per watt, (as they told their investors) they should do well. (Unless they massively cut TDP's)
For VR, I prefer the frame timing of my 6800XT over my 3080Ti, but the 3080Ti has just enough grunt to run my sims at night with lowered settings and the 6800XT can't quite do it.
The 6800XT basically "feels" better in VR up to the point where it can't hold 90fps, then it's pretty bad. (I think Nvidia's reprojection works better so the 3080Ti remains playable when it starts to struggle)
Another 50% (for either card) should give me the grunt to run at night. If RDNA3 maintains the same solid frame pacing, and the price is good, AMD could get another sale from me.
RDNA 3 is looking efficient. it only has 2x 8 pin power cables indicating TDP between 300 and 350, probably closer to 350w given the size of the amd triple fan cooler has increased (the heatsink is larger)
It's interesting that amd has reworked the memory configuration, they've lowered L3 gamecache size compared to what rdna2 has and it's probably because they are getting extra bandwidth from faster vram modules
Last edited: