Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 29,416
Where is that video?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I didn't get my card for the RT, i got it as an upgrade over my 64, so if i can't run some games with it on, then i just won't run them games with it on.
Is not like Metro or Control didn't implement RT correctly or good enough (although in some places is darker than it should, but then maybe a proper HDR is required anyway?), it couldn't do much due to the limitation of the hardware. For instance, in Control, I can only do 720p upscaled to 1080p to keep 60fps constant on a 2080 and is still quite nosy in darker areas, plus uses a lot of "cheats" - trying to stream in stuff too aggressively which also gets noticed at times + the washout out look of non-native image.
Maybe just for reflections is not going to kill the performance as much, but if they fake those good enough through traditional means, the difference will be low enough for many to not care if you balance it with the performance cost - and, of course, hardware cost. If you look at the Blacksmith demo, The Heretic demo, Book Of The Dead, even The Infiltrator (or Crysis 3), as a whole, they all look better than Control (for me at least), I'd even say that The Blacksmith, 4 years old demo, looks more next gen than anything is out on the market or will be launched soon. And no RT.
For a lot of gamers Cyberpunk 2077 is being marked as the second coming of Jesus. To be fair it looks very good, but I will wait for reviews.
Star Citizen also
And the list is long of the flopped second coming of Jesus games last few years.
Cyberpunk seems to be the pinnacle of these though. Honestly people I know basically talk about it at length daily. I know dozens who have pre-ordered it already and won't listen to a single possibly bad word about it.
Cyberpunk seems to be the pinnacle of these though. Honestly people I know basically talk about it at length daily. I know dozens who have pre-ordered it already and won't listen to a single possibly bad word about it.
Pre-order isn't exactly cheaper than release usually so not sure why anyone would want to pre order a game that could potentially be disappointing.
I am with you man, it makes little sense to me. It's just one of those games it seems that people will crawl over hot coals for a demo let alone the actual game.
If it runs 4K/30 and seems fun (providing I can demo it) I'll get it, if it lags or is some sort of grind fest game then it's in the bin.
It looks great, but I know other games that have looked great and fallen flat so I will wait.
Cyberpunk seems to be the pinnacle of these though. Honestly people I know basically talk about it at length daily. I know dozens who have pre-ordered it already and won't listen to a single possibly bad word about it.
Did you buy a leather jacket as well.
There are a lot of games that still don't look as good as 10+ year old 3D Marks scenes - it is far far harder to do a proper game looking good than a tech demo with constraints to prevent people seeing where it breaks down. Look at Subnautica for instance which uses the same Unity engine as some of those demos.
Does it have an Nvidia logo on it and is it sign by Jensen?Already got one
Well said Gregster. Both sides need to understand thisWhat people have to understand but always seem to miss is "one man's trash is another man's gold". I don't like marmite but appreciate that others do, I have seen many films that have been slated and very much enjoyed them. Nothing worse to me when someone doesn't like something, it becomes the worst thing ever and anyone who likes it is a newbz!
*Cough* Fallout 4 *Cough*