Red Orchestra (2) : Heroes of Stalingrad
- Thread starter Mahnsikir
- Start date
i think 48 plats better, has better tatics is more emersive because u can stay alive much longer with out getting camped out.
Also 48 plays better with countdown to with 64 you have to wait ages.... to respawn
it might be an idea in the future to have 2x48 rather than 1x 64 perhaps?
Also 48 plays better with countdown to with 64 you have to wait ages.... to respawn
it might be an idea in the future to have 2x48 rather than 1x 64 perhaps?
Soldato
i think 48 plats better, has better tatics is more emersive because u can stay alive much longer with out getting camped out.
Also 48 plays better with countdown to with 64 you have to wait ages.... to respawn
it might be an idea in the future to have 2x48 rather than 1x 64 perhaps?
Was about to post this last night,
I would be up for donating to have two servers, one 48 slot on a TE-CD rotation (like the server is currently set up)
And then another 48 slot TE only server.
Both with FallenFighters removed
Also I think we could do with a couple more admins,
Few times now myself/knightstalker or a few other ocuk people are getting session banned for no reason, then you have to wait until the map changes.
Plus I think it's too much to ask of gimpy to do all the admining himself (although you have been doing a great job so far getting everything sorted)
Last edited:
Some server admins are complete A-holes! Got banned from a server because I stabbed one of the admins. When someone abused me in-game and I told them to "p*** off* The admin I had stabbed used it as an excuse to ban me for language :/ lame...
certainly not slagging the game off, just getting a few problems sorted out to get best out of my set up. got 8600cpu, 5870 gpu, 8gb ram, 1680x1050 monitor, what settings would you recommend ?
Associate
What sort of state is this in now after recent updates? I havent played in over a week.
When it works it's good but it doesn't take long for most systems to feel the bugs and or performance problems!. Go on TW forums or Steam to see what i mean
Permabanned
Yeh right
I don't think perofrmance is an issue now, only the bugs.
Most perofrmance issues are people expecting to be able to have all settings at ultra on a q6600.
I have a similar setup to yours and have most on medium/high with shadows off and a lower res.
Runs fine.
Lower the settings and go on map with sub 50 players.
I'm on low to medium ffs it's fine at first then it dives out into the low teens!
There are 7 pages of people with this issue
http://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/showthread.php?t=61789&page=7
There are 7 pages of people with this issue
http://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/showthread.php?t=61789&page=7
Permabanned
I have AA and Shadows off/low as possible.
Res is 1280x1024 (iirc)
Post processing off.
Never really dips below 25fps, unless there are 30+ players on screens and an airstrike etc i.e. lots going on.
The only issues i have are keys remapping themselves and losing sound every now and again.
Permabanned
I see this game as a playable beta.
It was £20 and we will get lots of DLC for free, the trade off is the bugs.
Battlefield 3 will be at least £30 and have it's own bugs and we will have to pay for DLC.
If they can get it running well before BF3/MW3 it may well survive, if they don't many will bin it and move on.
It was £20 and we will get lots of DLC for free, the trade off is the bugs.
Battlefield 3 will be at least £30 and have it's own bugs and we will have to pay for DLC.
If they can get it running well before BF3/MW3 it may well survive, if they don't many will bin it and move on.
Associate
- Joined
- 9 May 2005
- Posts
- 448
Appreciate you point of view, however this game will be around for a good few years yet. With the free DLC and other updates I can see that a fair few ppl will be playing this ( as with RO1 ) for some considerable time.
I will not be participating in the latest increment in the BF saga, its just not my cup of tea.
Permabanned
Some will, but many will leave it.
If i had the choice of beta testing RO2 or playing BF3/MW3/generic shooter, i would pick the latter.
Permabanned
That wasn't the point i was making.
RO2 is a great game, people get annoyed at bugs and play something else, by the time they are bored with Game 2, Game 3 is out.
Soldato
I can see myself still playing this for a long time yet,
It's still very enjoyable at the moment and with the updates coming and when the SDK gets more features we will see mods, maps and all sorts of goodies to keep us entertained for ages.
I still have yet to pre-order BF3 due to playing RO2 so much, I may even leave BF3 for a while and pick it up at a later date.
It's still very enjoyable at the moment and with the updates coming and when the SDK gets more features we will see mods, maps and all sorts of goodies to keep us entertained for ages.
I still have yet to pre-order BF3 due to playing RO2 so much, I may even leave BF3 for a while and pick it up at a later date.
Soldato
Right I'm back at the PC, yes I can see it in browser. Below is my SS from about 10 mins ago
Davey could see it yesterday, as per his post and image here
http://www.thesasclan.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=12322