I've not seen, and excuse me for being out of touch, the bit where Iran says that they are backing the Houthi guys...
IF Iran are backing someone that's being a dick, then they should expect retaliatory strikes, but, to this point I've not seen anything official from the Iranian Government saying that they are supporting the Houthi lot...
Why give the Iranians and their proxies ample warning to get their assets out of dodge before attacking? Why not just level the ***** and then answer any questions afterwards?
Well they're ****** if they move assets over the border and into Iran. Despite all the bravado and rhetoric, they don't have the nads to attack targets inside Iran.So the spy satellites can see where they move all their stuff to. Blow up the fixed installations first then maybe tomorrow night bomb where they moved the assets to.
And you never will. It would be pointless using the Houthi, if Iran shouted from the rooftops that they are backing them.I've not seen, and excuse me for being out of touch, the bit where Iran says that they are backing the Houthi guys...
The narrative on the BBC is that it's to avoid "escalating" the situation into a full on war between the US and Iran. Essentially makes the strikes symbolic since any Iranians and the militias will be long gone.Why give the Iranians and their proxies ample warning to get their assets out of dodge before attacking? Why not just level the ***** and then answer any questions afterwards?
I would imagine the evidence is not that strong or it's hearsay that Iran are backing them. I don't think Iran have officially said they're backing the Houthis. Also, again avoiding a US vs Iran war, which would probably lead to all out conflict in the Middle East.I've not seen, and excuse me for being out of touch, the bit where Iran says that they are backing the Houthi guys...
IF Iran are backing someone that's being a dick, then they should expect retaliatory strikes, but, to this point I've not seen anything official from the Iranian Government saying that they are supporting the Houthi lot...
What makes you think that ?Sounds like the US has worked with Iraqi and Syrian military and government (hence the delay). The US then appear to the middle east as respecting sovereign boundaries and governments.
BreakingIraq summons US envoy in protest over airstrikes
Iraq's foreign ministry has summoned the US envoy in Baghdad todeliver a formal memorandum of protest over the retaliatory US airstrikes launched overnight, state news agency INA reports.
Also had to check on the B1 Lancer it always looks small to me but after doing a size comparison (ooo errr) its bloody big
What makes you think that ?
The US would never work with the Syrian government or military, Iraq maybe but generally the Iraqi government isn't much on friendly terms with the US and tolerates their presence
US takes out Iranian backed militants in the Iraq and Syria.. but publicly they throw their toys out to prevent any repercussions to themselves.. don't you think it's a bit odd that Iraq and Syria didn't get a shot off to a large number of planes flying into their country aerospace?
B1 is a beast. I saw one at Fairford a few years back, the beast blew past with the wings back, afterburners on and set off a loads of car alarms in the carparkThe BBC really needs pulling apart now, its been infected politically for far to long both by Labour and the Tories, all the top jobs taken by friends of friends of friends from posh schools..... Not one of them an ounce of integrity.
Still nice to See Iran getting what's due, and has been for a significant amount of time.
Also had to check on the B1 Lancer it always looks small to me but after doing a size comparison (ooo errr) its bloody big