Neither do I. I’m also all for the complete decriminalisation of all narcotics.Potato potarto. Word it however you want, but I don't like it.
If people want to smoke, let them. Tax it to high heaven but don’t ban it.
Neither do I. I’m also all for the complete decriminalisation of all narcotics.Potato potarto. Word it however you want, but I don't like it.
I'm fine with it being taxed in line with everything else, plus the amount that it costs the NHS. I'm not in favour of taxing the crap out of smokers just because we can (even though we already do).Neither do I. I’m also all for the complete decriminalisation of all narcotics.
If people want to smoke, let them. Tax it to high heaven but don’t ban it.
Neither do I. I’m also all for the complete decriminalisation of all narcotics.
Smoking is great these days because it's just a tax on the stupid.
13.5% of adults in 2020 apparently, down from 20% in 2011. I couldn't see earlier data but its fallen from about 45% of adults in 1974, been on a steady trend lower. The target is under 5% in 2030.I literally thought smoking was a "dying" trend anyway. I know 2 people that smoke now. Who on earth can afford to smoke in the uk? Isnt it like 15 quid a packet? ( lol 5 quid in Sweden, move here idiots)
they most certainly should not!!People should be allowed to do want they want
dunno, i get what you're saying but i don't see how comparing smoking with adventure sports and the like really works.I'm on the fence on this - there are plenty of things which to many people make zero sense but some people still want to do - as long as the impact to other people is zero or reasonably mitigated. (Sure someone smoking themselves to death can have an impact on their family etc. but that is another matter).
Should we also ban people from anything which might hurt them? motor sports, hurling themselves off cliffs for fun (diving), etc. etc.
there'll still be plenty of defence of those activities. hell, alcohol should be banned given the governments stance on most drugs, yet isn't. i don't think anyones taking away your carling, kebab and mars bar any time soon.People in support, they'll come for alcohol and fatty/sugary foods next and you wont have any defence.
Quite a few people I know are switching to e-cigarettes.
I wish they were required to put nic levels on cigarettes too (and tar). It's a nightmare figuring out strengths unless you're familiar with the brand and know how their lines correlate with strength.
This, what NZ did.The minimum smoking age should be raised annually by one year. So this year it's 18 (or whatever), next year it's 19, then it's 20.
It's not rocket science, within a generation, nobody will smoke. I've been saying this for over twenty years.
They did, 0% booze is boomingthey should remove the alcohol from alcoholic drinks to save the NHS and police time
There is literally nothing good about smoking. Nothing.
While increasing the risk of cancer.Many Europeans in Africa found that smoking kept the mosquitos away, thus reducing the risk of malaria.
Or just an increase in crime...If a pack of fags cost £30 and wasn’t sold in supermarkets, petrol stations, corner shops and pretty much everywhere then we would almost certainly see fewer smokers.
Nicotine patches just prolong the addiction to nicotine, ergo the desire for cigarettes. It was the cleverest scam by the tobacco firms ever.
Nicotine is the addictive element. If you want to break the habit, you need to isolate and remove the addictive component. People don't just smoke because it is "pleasant" (as it is distinctly unpleasant).
And yet, there's a whole category for it on pron sites... Somebody out there clearly has a fag fetish.To be honest, smoking is about the least sexy thing someone can do. No bigger turn off than the stench of ashtray while you're "going about your business"
Now that's something you don't want to accidently type into a search engine.And yet, there's a whole category for it on pron sites... Somebody out there clearly has a fag fetish.
People who smoke and/or are obese tend to be lower economic status, they might cost less, but I would wager they pay substantially less tax than healthy people on average.The true costs of treating smokers, the obese and the healthy
In 2008 the Dutch government looked into the cost of treating people from the age of 20 to death. They had three categories, the healthy, obese and smokers. The results were not what the health gur…daveatherton.wordpress.com
Tax gyms healthy people are costing the tax payers a fortune .
?? You saying nicotine isn't addictive?Or just an increase in crime...
And yet decades of reinforcement tests, in humans and other lab animals, show nicotine most often fails to result in addiction, especially at the levels found in cigarettes...
And yet, there's a whole category for it on pron sites... Somebody out there clearly has a fag fetish.