Associate
- Joined
- 19 May 2010
- Posts
- 1,717
- Location
- Cheltenham
"Legally different categories"....ok....but in reality even to you it's more then that.....which do you save if you only have time to save one from falling off a cliff? Assuming the child....so then do the next test, if the dog is easier to save first but it adds 10% extra risk to your childs safety do you save the dog first......?
One more step...if your dog and another person's child run out in front of your car you can steer away from one but into the other which do you choose?
Clearly it's not the same and it's not about legal category.... Your just upset that other people don't care about your pets...
Ahh, hypotheticals. How about you replace the dog with another child and give yourself the choice of which of your children to save? How about if it was the child’s mother/your partner? In theory of course I would save my child, but reality these are all trolley problems with answers that have a million factors involved in split second decisions which you can’t predict and assume there’s no other option.
I don’t care what you or anyone think about my pet or my child, but neither is going up for adoption. (Although the 1 year old is currently pushing the limits of that more than the dog ever has…)